InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 4700
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/21/2009

Re: RD759 post# 63587

Thursday, 05/15/2014 9:02:48 PM

Thursday, May 15, 2014 9:02:48 PM

Post# of 80983
sounds like doctor "scum bag" decosta

reads this board. No doubt he needs to keep tabs on how well his deception is panning out. "From what I understand, these accusations of our geoscientists doing a lousy job stems from a picture on the photo gallery of one of our geologists which was captioned something like "Medinah geologist taking a sample". An accusation was made from a geologist on IHUB that his technique was all wrong. It was a photo opportunity for crying out loud and the caption was probably written by management not knowing what the geologist was doing.

It appears that whomever is writing some of the assay updates assumes that we know about these standards and guidelines as to why "channel samples" are assumed in an adit until noted otherwise or that we speak a little Spanish. In the highly fractured rock in the gold winze/shaft this rock is not very "competent" for channel sampling with a saw. Here small "bulk samplings" might be the preferred methodology for the sampling of "representative" rock. That's the call of the geoscientist doing the sampling who no doubt doesn't speak much English.