InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,492.96
(
0.11%
)
US TECH 100
19,451.80
(
0.22%
)
Dow Jones
38,922.43
(
0.23%
)
Brent Oil
85.19
(
0.58%
)
Bitcoin
64,848.17
(
-0.18%
)
Post# of 68829
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

strangelove

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 23
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/23/2014

strangelove

Re: None

Tuesday, 05/13/2014 7:51:56 PM

Tuesday, May 13, 2014 7:51:56 PM

Post# of 68829
I'm of the opinion that the patents haven't been monetized in the past due to the surrounding litigation, especially over patent ownership. With that resolved and the USPTO rejection of Alarm-Force's application citing REVO's patent, I believe the portfolio has taken on value it previously did not exhibit. Much more lucrative for a big player to acquire rather than battle a patent troll citing infringement. Owning potentially disruptive technology outright rather than licensing it would also be a plus. All just my opinion, of course.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up