InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 122024
Next 10
Followers 39
Posts 5491
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/30/2013

Re: None

Tuesday, 05/13/2014 7:33:19 PM

Tuesday, May 13, 2014 7:33:19 PM

Post# of 122024
FEDERALLY ILLEGAL yes, but arguably not. Here's why:

1) The President of the United States of America had publically stated he would not aim to interfere with the newly legalized State's practices, as long as they stayed within the boundaries, as set forth by each State.
2) Financing and banking is still difficult, for the trade is still Federally illegal, but becoming more and more available as new States consider introducing their own measures.
3) It's probably safe to say that cannabis (commonly known as marijuana) has been predominantly acceptable in U.S. society for some time, amongst the "leadership" of our country and the Tax Paying Citizens. The taboo has died. We can all agree on that, I hope.

Do the easy DD.

The Banks and the Feds are employing some kind of "test market, cat-n-mouse" tactic. Neither wants to be the first to fully engage, without the other fully behind. Eventually, the banks will give in, starting with locals, onto "the Bigs". Let's not forget Wall St.

Do you see the pattern? It's not charts. It's not reports or PR's. This is what Perlowin sees. If he positions himself correctly in the marketplace, and stays competitive, he can't lose.

LONG HEMP. GLTA.