No Jimtash, it is NOT a change of attorney. It is the notice the existing patent attorney is bailing because Radient has not paid for his services.
This is the exact reason the patent attorney gave for withdrawing.
"(5) The client fails substantially to fulfill an obligation to the practitioner regarding the practitioner's services and has been given reasonable warning that the practitioner will withdraw unless the obligation is fulfilled; "
What happens.
Radient can attempt to get another patent attorney to handle the patent application.
As long as no immediate action for a response in required, Radient can hire another patent attorney.
Wait, where do they get the money?
Do you think the Aussies are interested in keeping the latest application current.
I have never shorted nor intend to have any financial interest in this stock. I am not connected with anyone who trades, shorts or has financial interests in this stock. I only post facts and my opinions. I do not post on IHUB with different aliases.