InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 3893
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/28/2005

Re: Amanita post# 42548

Friday, 05/09/2014 4:36:44 PM

Friday, May 09, 2014 4:36:44 PM

Post# of 45771
"There will be more of this is my guess, there is no one to service them (CCT's). Could lack of service led to or mean "unsafe" ?"

That's doesn't add up, if the units were unsafe CDEx probably would have breached the service agreement and the hospital wouldn't have be compeled to pay off the contract.

Similarly, if the units did not do what CDEx advertised (something they are well known for doing) that would also have been cause for trashing the unit without final payment.

I think the unit was just redundant (like you said) and just didn't add any additional benefits making it worth using.

I can just see CDEx dangling them the proverbial carrot by telling them of all the upcoming new features the unit will soon have- all total BS of course and not in the contract!

Could be why they originally bought the service, but after no new upgrades materialized they simple knew they'd been swindled and wanted nothing more to do with CDEx.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.