InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 61
Posts 7564
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 02/10/2010

Re: Aspenmp post# 89778

Thursday, 05/08/2014 9:54:32 AM

Thursday, May 08, 2014 9:54:32 AM

Post# of 146301
I don't 'hope' that the 'Cides work. I see nothing but evidence to support the idea that Flucide should be safe, and effective.

I actually just see no a priori reason to think that the ligand binding chemistry of the Flucide that has worked so well in animal models would suddenly stop working in human systems and within a chemically similar mamalian circulatory system.

I actually just see no a priori reason to think that there would suddenly be significant Toxic effects to human cells and organ systems, when no such effects have been observed in biologically similar mamalian cells and organ systems.

BUT - and this is the big but - a possibility does exist that there could be toxic effects at proposed clinical levels of Flucide for humans. AND - there is a possibility that there is some overlooked factor in human biology that might decrease or eliminate effective anti-flu activity for Flucide.

THAT IS WHY they need to do the testing. PERIOD.

THAT IS ALSO WHY - in order to silence the most vocal of current critics - they need to get those studies done, those data collected, and any analyses completed.

It's not 'Hope' that the product works as it appears it should work.

It's an expectation that the mound of animal testing data to date has some predictive value as to what to expect. It's an expectation that chemistry and ligand binding are predictable and stable.

So - to call it "Hope" is to mischaracterize the thinking of (at least) this particular long holder.

“The two most powerful warriors are patience and time.”
- Leo Nikolaevich Tolstoy

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NNVC News