Greenshift Corporation (GERS)

[Slashnuts]

Wrong, 100% Patently False.

This Judge has granted Summary Judgment 7 out of 8 times. The remaining case settled without a trial. 0 cases made it to trial.

The Judge's history from 8 cases is granting Summary Judgment 7 times or 87.5% of the time. The remaining case settled for $10.5M (GERS has 24 cases) and 0% went to trial. 95% of all cases settle without a trial regardless of which judge. With this judge, 100% settled without a trial.

Some will point out the defendants, not the plaintiffs, prevailed on those SJ motions, however each case is unique. I've reviewed the history of several of those cases. It was clear which way the Judge was leaning, and he ruled accordingly.

The opposite is true here. The Judge appears to be leaning in GERS' favor, verifiable by his rulings thus far. Reinforced by the USPTO's findings in GERS' favor. The good judge doesn't rule in favor of a defendant simply because he favors defendants. He will rule on the merits of each case, which seem to be un-disputably favorable to GERS. Nobody has been able to prove otherwise.

http://www.greenshift.com/content/investorresources/pdf/supplemental_order.pdf

http://www.greenshift.com/News/item/4

Judge
last name
Judge first
name District court

McKinney Larry Indiana Southern

Identified
decision

8

Median
damages

$10,520,507

Time to trail
0.0%

% of
decisions
that are SJs

87.5%

http://www.pwc.com/en_US/us/forensic-services/publications/assets/2013-patent-litigation-study.pdf

Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$!$!$