Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[skweze]

Anything is possible. But so vaguely worded it's difficult to draw a conclusion. "Upon information and belief, CW3 believes.." seems to concede pure conjecture rather than first hand knowledge on the part of CW3. Moreover, why would anyone be expected to "verify the accuracy" of data to the extent suggested in the normal course of a double blind study before "releasing statements?" The entire premise defies common sense.

An interesting question regarding CW3 is when the plaintiff that brought CW3 forward knew about the AbbVie discussions.

One possibility is CW3 is telling the truth?

"Upon information and belief, CW3 believes that Abbvie refused to do business with a company or its executives who would be deliberately reckless in releasing statements about the positive nature of clinical data before verifying the accuracy of the data or the truth and accuracy of their own statements or who even
failed to verify which patients received which substance, placebo or bavituximab."