"The Transparency of BHRT in SEC Filings shows...? WHAT? Huh?
Transparency, i.e truth in SEC filings = "integrity of the leadership"?
Since when? As far as I know, being "transparent" on govt. regulated, legally binding, fiduciary bound documents- is called being "normal" and in compliance with "law" and anything less than that, would typically be called being "in violation of the law", IMO.
It's simply being "legal" and "in compliance" with what is expected of "leadership" and does not indicate or display any special attributes or "integrity" above and beyond what is "generally accepted" business practices, IMO. Further, a fiduciary bound and legally licensed audit firm, also puts their name and reputation on those SEC filed documents- and could put themselves, their firm, their licences, etc in jeopardy if anything less than "integrity" and "transparency" was used in preparation of any SEC filed documents, IMO.
Being anything other than 100% "transparent", truthful, full disclosure, whatever term one wants to use- can land whoever signs off on those documents (and their audit firm), in trouble with Federal law, as in SEC law. Which can include anything from fines, up to, and including prison time. So, not sure how being truthful or "transparent" on a SEC filing is anything but what is "normal" and expected of the management of any public traded company? Anything less and it's considered potentially criminal, typically, IMO.
"it appears that the Marvel Trials where suspended because of the feasibility (not feasability) of the usefulness of the therapy on the patients"?? Huh? What? Huh again?
Most recent 10-K, PAGE 2:
"We are seeking to secure sufficient funds to reinitiate enrollment in the MARVEL and REGEN trials. If we successfully secure such funds, we intend to re-engage a contract research organization, or CRO, investigators and certain suppliers to advance such trials."
Thus, according to the company's own words, in their own, most recent filed 10-K: the Marvel "trial" singular (not "trials") is suspended for lack of funding and if funded, per that statement above, would begin to "reinitiate" (which means to re-start something, that's been stopped previously)
I don't find any company statement indicating that, "Marvel Trials where suspended because of the feasability of the usefulness of the therapy on the patients that where facing the worst outcome from Severe Heart Degeneration."??
If that wording, or anything similar to it, is in the 10-K, or any BHRT SEC filed document, a document name and page number reference, or cut n paste of exact wording would be much appreciated.
"(Pending Litigation)? Dade County? Outside the IP agreements? "?? Have no idea what that sentence means, or is supposed to mean or imply or what? Anybody having an idea- would appreciate some input on it. Thanks in advance.
"A Safety Study would be productive in advancing treatment for patients outside the control groups of the Marvel Trial. Without the safety Assessment it would be like throwing money away as Marvel was already in front of the FDA. "??
Again, have zero clue what that statement is supposed to mean, or even says? Any help, further input, clarification would be much appreciated? Marvel was already "in front of the FDA"? What does that mean? "studies outside of control groups"? What does that mean?
Any help- much appreciated. Thanks again.
