InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 220
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/05/2007

Re: houtheman post# 24839

Wednesday, 04/30/2014 4:58:45 PM

Wednesday, April 30, 2014 4:58:45 PM

Post# of 30378
The problem that I was trying to bring up before is that what gets reported on every stock screener in the financial world isn't $1+, is a loss of $0.69 and the corresponding P/E of NA.

The big boys don't buy in afterhours because there isn't the volume available. Hammering a stock for taking a non-cash charge for appreciating in value ... doesn't make sense to anyone with any sense of finacial education. Pleanty of firms will be happy to take the stock at these prices.

FYI the PR written for the Sacremento paper is much more concise...

http://www.sacbee.com/2014/04/30/6367633/pacific-ethanol-reports-higher.html
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent ALTO News