InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 445
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/19/2014

Re: ben711210 post# 8955

Wednesday, 04/30/2014 1:18:19 PM

Wednesday, April 30, 2014 1:18:19 PM

Post# of 9646
ben711210: I can see where VRNG would be a buyout contender of WLGC because of the type of business that VRNG is in. With what DSS does I don't see a fit. I don't see where either company has the financial resources to buy WLGC even as low as $1.00 per share and I believe that WLGC's patents are worth a lot more than $1.00 per share if the company would only enforce their intellectual property rights! I believe that the reason WLGC has not enforced their intellectual property rights is because they don't have the financial resources to accomplish that. I have not found one WLGC share holder going all the way back to 2004 that disagrees with me about the significant number of companies that are infringing upon WLGC's patents. Air tight patents like WLGC has are worthless if the company ( any company ) does not enforce their intellectual property rights! I will not repeat my previous posts other than to say WLGC should obtain the financial resources to enforce their intellectual property rights even if they have to give a significant amount of any court judgment/out of court settlement to the financial backer(s)in order to get some revenues and future royalties! That would be better than the continual software improvements/developments and the pps floundering. A licensing agreement with some company would be a positive. Sincerely, Senior Chief

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.