InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 375
Posts 16966
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 03/07/2014

Re: Investaholic33 post# 8622

Wednesday, 04/30/2014 12:19:57 AM

Wednesday, April 30, 2014 12:19:57 AM

Post# of 106837
Just an FYI on Youtube videos getting pulled down- it happens 1000's if not, 10,000's of times a day. Youtube has "review" staff working "flagged" videos, 24/7, 365. A simple google search will reveal 100's, 1000's of articles and videos on "how to not get your video removed" or "how come my video got removed" and all variations thereof.

It doesn't take a law firm or litigation to get a Youtube video pulled down for a violation of Google/Youtube TOS.

I watch all kinds of videos- rock and other types of bands, movies, aviation, comedy, just about anything. And videos I had "liked" or whatever, get yanked down all the time, and for all various reasons. It's common knowledge to anyone even remotely familiar with being a Youtube user on a regular basis. It's one of the biggest complaints- is that videos you "liked" or want to re-watch or whatever, just "vanish" and get yanked constantly.

Most of the time, someone just shoves um right back up again- happens 1000's of times a day. There was a great recording of Tom Cruise doing his famous (deemed bizarre and funny by most) "scientology interview" - it went massively viral. Then, the late night comedian, Craig Furgeson did his own spoof of the interview- funny as all get out and it went even more massively viral. Of course Tommy Cruise and crew step in and start getting um yanked down. As fast as one would come down, another dude would just repost it. Went on for months. Happens ALL THE TIME.

It's not a big "legal case", involving or needing a law firm of all things, to "pull" or "get a video pulled" on Youtube as you're "trying" to infer IMO. It's a simple deal to "flag" a Youtube video- and watch it vanish. Just Youtube SOP, typical, another day as usual, no big deal IMO. Doesn't take some law firm, and the board "internet lawyers" tossing out the ole "libel" and "slander" talk as usual. Same old, same old nonsense talk as always, IMO.