InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 375
Posts 16966
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 03/07/2014

Re: Investaholic33 post# 8622

Tuesday, 04/29/2014 11:26:35 PM

Tuesday, April 29, 2014 11:26:35 PM

Post# of 106837
"matters of libel and slander against the company. "?? What "libel and slander" against the company? Where? When? Give examples please?

You kinda left out the other parts of what they do- as in "intellectual property" and "privacy" - and look at the date of that "PR" announcing them as a "service provider" and then look on the Broward county court site, for the filing date of the suit naming Comella as a defendant. Just saying, they're pretty darn close together IMHO. Only an opinion- but the dates sure line up awfully close IMO. (PR Sept. 30, 2013) (Broward county site, filed suit, Oct 28th, 2013)

The latest 10-K just got released, they always contain a section(s) regarding disclosure of any "litigation" matters, and it says they're involved in none. So what "libel and slander" litigation and legal actions are being taken? Got any proof?

In that most recent 10-K, the name of that firm you cite- it appears nowhere in the 10-K that I can find? Not one name in that firm, not the firm- no reference to them is made in the 10-K?

Most recent 10-K, PAGE 17:
"We are not currently a party to any litigation or other adverse proceeding related to our patents, patent licenses or intellectual property rights"

Most recent 10-K, PAGE 48:
"Legal Proceedings

We are not presently engaged in any material litigation and are unaware of any threatened material litigation."

Most recent 10-K, PAGE 80:
"At present, there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors or executive officers as to which indemnification is required or permitted and we are not aware of any threatened litigation or proceeding that may result in a claim for indemnification."

So, if this firm, " Mitrani, Rynor, Adamsky, & Toland " appear nowhere in the most recently released 10-K, and, every instance of the word search "litigation" says they are involved in "none"- then what makes this "claim" being stated as valid, IMO?

Does one ever check the legal, SEC filed documents? Or is it always just conjecture and hyperbole and made up opinions, IMHO?