InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 403
Posts 6495
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/06/2012

Re: wealththrupennies post# 47731

Tuesday, 04/29/2014 7:24:52 PM

Tuesday, April 29, 2014 7:24:52 PM

Post# of 163725
Loaded Response: FROZ Filing IV and VWAP

After reading the filing again it states, "aggregate trading volume to exceed $50 million", less $0.002 per share.

IV settled for $2,377,000 plus a 7% third party agent fee and attorney fees divided by 80% of the the closing price not to exceed the arithmetic average of the volume weighted average prices of any five trading days during a period equal to that number of consecutive trading days following the date of initial receipt of shares.

The "any five trading days", "equal to that number of consecutive trading days" is twisting me up a bit....
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here is where the math gets tricky based on the "any five trading days"

I've put the equation down providing me with the volume weighted average price; however this was based on using the 21st closing price through the equation providing me with a VWAP of .01256 (originally .0182), but we are not certain if the .0182 is being utilized consistently for this equation OR if the VWAP of five trading days during a period equal to that number of consecutive trading days following the date will be used.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

When will the $50M hit....? That seems to be the loaded question of the day. Without really understand the formula being used each day as the VWAP I don't have an answer to this.... I know there are other post about it and came to the same conclusion but with PPS staying this low we REALLY need to kick things up a notch....

Another coincidence maybe.... But the Shareholder Information PR is on Radar, Financials are on Radar, and the Name/Ticker are as well - along with anything else juicy. SO HERE IS MY TAKE.....COULD BE 100% WRONG.....

Since IV was issued 202,937,000 and could possibly be required to return (excess shares of the 435M issuance ) or be entitled to receive shares (the balance of 435M - 202,937,000), perhaps the goal to trend the price down from .0182 to these lower levels was to obtain a smaller average to maximize IVs share structure and eventually force the PPS back up with a series of developments, which we all know are on the radar! There is nothing in the wording that states IV is entitled to ACQUIRE MORE than the 435M issuance, so wouldn't IV want APT to drive this price as far as possible once shares are obtain so they can SELL MUCH HIGHER achieving price maximization?

We do know this as well... In connection with the transaction, IV agreed not to hold any short position in the issuer’s common stock, and not to engage in or effect, directly or indirectly, any short sale until at least 180 days after the end of the calculation period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

So the question comes back to... is this over tomorrow, EOW, etc. I honestly don't know but I have to believe if the theory of maxing out the share issuance to IV is feasible it'll be more beneficial in the long run. Again a lot of this is thinking out loud and I wanted to share my thoughts and approach on this filing.

This method of IV acquiring and selling back to maximize profits could work out in out favor to drive up these prices.... Especially is IV is buying on the way up on top of the share issuance at the bottom....

As you can see this response is VERY LOADED.

B!

My postings are of my own opinion and not investing advise. Conduct your own due diligence and/or comprehensive research before investing. .