InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 224
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/21/2014

Re: farviewhill post# 65349

Monday, 04/28/2014 4:38:15 PM

Monday, April 28, 2014 4:38:15 PM

Post# of 92948
Depends who you are talking about. Settlement had already been reached in the case where ACTC has now defaulted on an agreed payment. Perhaps they want to force it back into court, but judges aren't usually sympathetic to defaulters... and ACTC take a huge risk if they did it on purpose for that reason, and also if it does end up in a jury trial (not bench trial), juries can be notoriously unpredictable. ACTC appear to take all the risk in this action. The results may also detrimentally affect other settlements, or open up new litigation.. OR it may be ACTC think that with the restated filings they can lessen their liability, but that's a huge risk when IP is technically now at stake as well.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.