InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 3557
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/28/2007

Re: User336447 post# 266771

Saturday, 04/26/2014 5:26:35 PM

Saturday, April 26, 2014 5:26:35 PM

Post# of 312015
This post is worthy of being repeated?? What this is is an admission by investors that JBI is a scam. You should be focussing your efforts on trying to get as much money back as you can.

~would agree he has made optimistic statements, but just because they haven't happened yet, doesn't mean they won't happen in the future."

If Bordynuik has made optimistic statements and misled you, you should be upset and want your money back. ?? Is this not true with everything else in life? Houses, cars, clothing..,. You should take him to court and sue him for misrepresentation. You would win.

~. If the makers of the first hard drive said their device will be capable of storing 1GB of data, but their first design only stores 100MB, would you say that technology wasn't worth investing in because they haven't achieved their stated goal?~

Yes. It is not an R&D budget. It is your money. you were misled.

~Running a public company means the only way to raise money is by selling shares. Shares derive their value from hope and expectation. You can't convince greedy shareholders to buy shares if it doesn't look amazing, quick and easy.~

WOW.I have never read such a frank admission of poor investing and running a successful scam in my life. You are basally saying that investors here were sold a bill of goods. Lied to. Misled.

~Do you think JBI would have raised even half the money they did by saying only their "safest" expectations. John did what he had to do to get us to this point. He's playing the game. ~

Exactly. He just wanted investors money, and does not really care about the outcome. I could have told you that back in 2010 when I started posting here. Now you realize it, and your best answer is that you are going to wait and see what happens next?? My answer to you is... not much.

The only thing I can`t believe is that Heddle is mixed up in all of this.