InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 190
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/03/2013

Re: traderfjp post# 112753

Saturday, 04/26/2014 1:17:56 PM

Saturday, April 26, 2014 1:17:56 PM

Post# of 194796
For the record, a 100:1 reverse split would be more dramatic than you suggest regarding the number of shares that a shareholder would retain. 20,000/100 = 200, not 2k.