No Doctor expects that a patient will live forever, and eventually he will lose the battle to keep the patient from dying. The aim of all medicine is to postpone the inevitable as long as possible. Or maybe make the going as pain free and comfortable as possible. But in that battle, even though the patient may be comatose or unaware, in essence already gone, the Doctors often continue the struggle.
But the point is, no device or procedure nor process can "save lives". Which is an arrogant claim of CDEX re their DOO-HICKEY.
But does it fit into the PROCESS of medical practice?? Can it be useful?? Is it actually worth the cost?? Are there other ways of lessening the mistakes in the PROCESS less intrusive to the flow of events included in the process?? That is for the medical practitioners to decide. So far, they have not embraced any of the CDEX "solutions" in any meaningful way. CDEX is selling and they are not buying.
Enter the G4 on which all CDEX hopes are now seemingly focused. Really it is only an idea. IMAGINARY G4. Not only is the medical industry not buying, it is selling few if any shares, which is obviously the true CDEX aim. NOT FOOLING THE MEDICOS> NOR THE LAY PUBLIC.
