No, keep "bothering" until we all get this right. I see two things, and I could be wrong on either or both. I see a CEO using it as an excuse OR a lack of understanding, especially thinking he's good for the entire year. The 30 day ongoing retest makes sense. Seems like it's the initial clock start that has me/us going back and forth since the reply doesn't address the fiscal year date as a determinant for beginning the 30 day cycle. Is your take that May 1st is the across the board kick-off irrespective of fiscal year? I know I saw the relevance of the fiscal year in a few other posts on other boards, and swear someone pulled it from the link to OTC's pdf. What am I missing? Frankly, at this pace, one might wonder (ugh!) if 1:50 is enough... maybe that's the agenda for certain groups(?). $EEDG
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
