InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 718
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/08/2009

Re: dcspka post# 21036

Tuesday, 04/22/2014 11:26:05 AM

Tuesday, April 22, 2014 11:26:05 AM

Post# of 30046
"They would not agree to pay out 2.5 million dollars to shysters if the company did not have valuable properties with a clear plan of putting them to good use."

Who are you calling a shyster? And your statement has a logical flaw -- the main reason to settle is because you don't want to spend time and money to go to court and run the risk of having to pay a much larger settlement.

You think Radient has "valuable properties? " name one.

"The Creeping Takeover is being executed thru lender debt conversion to shares?" no more shares. At .0001 or less, that converted about $400,000 of the $20 million debt.

"Clandestine manner?" the MJ rumor showed that there is a bottomless pit of shares on the ASK aat or under 0.0005. That killed the MJ rumor. Any objective investor who has followed the trading volumes and corresponding bid/ask prices knows this.

"Select RXPC detractors have created disinformation?" SEC filings constitute disinformation?

"When the Takeover is announced, the New Owners will most likely swap Provista shares for your RXPC stock. Resist closing your position out- hold your new shares until the IPO actually occurs."

Who are you talking to? Accordign to "investigative longs," 85% of all shares are held by lenders and the takeover group. Who are you preaching to here?

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.