InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 2315
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/12/2013

Re: lakeshore555 post# 21031

Tuesday, 04/22/2014 11:00:46 AM

Tuesday, April 22, 2014 11:00:46 AM

Post# of 30046
Lake Said About PDX and RXPC Merger

Lake You Said

proof that ProvistaDx does not have LC Sentinel in their pipeline?

http://www.provistadx.com/provistaDx-Pipeline.html

You call this proof? I do... It proves The Lung Cancer Test (LC SENTINEL/DR-70 will be in the pipeline of GCDX..You do greta DD but it appears you don't know how trade secrets and the mum mum about mergers are very important to a company for its success..If they broadcasted that what is going on behind the scenes, don't agree it would jeopardize their Merger plans and using the Radient shell to go public..Set aside your opinion about the debt..The lenders agreed to a debt to equity only because of the PLANNED Merger of RXPC and PDX...Why would the 2011 lenders put 8 million into Radient if that wasn't the case//Spare with your skipping record opinion on this issue...imo Wolf


Lake Said

"proof that Radient's gross revenues were only 5% of their operating costs after Jade revolted, and they lost $85 million in 2010 and $85 million in 2011?"

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/838879/000114420412037312/v316641_10k.htm
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/838879/000114420411032218/v218209_10k.htm

Wolf says..That is irrelevant about Jade..This is the RADIENT Board not the JADE Board you understand...


Lake Said

Proof that the Radient/Provista 2010 LOI was extended to 12/31/2010 (and not beyond)?

http://www.biospace.com/News/radient-pharmaceuticals-and-provista-life-sciences/197802

Wolf Says

True, except it was a LOI...Now that the PPPs is where it is..I would think that William Now sees an opportunity to take Radient over...Who owns 4.5 billion shares of the outstanding ? can you offer your opinin? imo

Proof that a LOI is not a binding contract? Just read the legal LOI instead of reading PR’s about the LOI. Since nothing happened by 12/31/2010, tha LOI terminated.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/838879/000095012310064927/a56670exv10w1.htm

Lake Says

Proof that CIT was written off as worthless? See the 2011 10K above.

Wolf Says

Exactly..You don't want to show assets when you are in a middle of a class action suit now do you? That would be ludicrous in my opinion...That is why ROSEN and Radient are settling for a mere 2.5 million dollars today..The 24th is coming up in two days.....imo Wolf

Proof or opinion? Look at the volume on February 24 over 700 million..The 24th of March..Over 300 million in volume..24th of April???? ahooooooooooooooooooo



Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.