InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 2315
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/12/2013

Re: lakeshore555 post# 21026

Tuesday, 04/22/2014 9:59:55 AM

Tuesday, April 22, 2014 9:59:55 AM

Post# of 30046
Lake comments about merger



You Said

"It is that simple, wolfie. This is not my opinion, it is a FACT, Provista Dx is not doing anything with LC Sentinel or DR-70 and they never will."


Wolf Says
Fact not your opinion? Then please show us where you got your facts from. One question. Why would ProvistaDX purchase the Breast Cancer and Lung Cancer from William and not intend to use it? tart the GCDX company soon after he sold the LC Sentinel to ProvistaDX..As you are aware from the facts I presented, it is true that William sold the Breast and Lung Cancer tests to ProvistaDX..Then Why did William s My opinion, He wanted to merge with Radient in 2010..The GCDX was set up by William, like he did with his other subsidiaries..Once the merger is completed, GCDX will be brought in to the ProvistaDx as a subsidiary and also stated from the facts I presented yesterday,facts, William is going to take ProvistaDX private..Which shell will he use? Radient or Dignyte? imo

Lake said

"Radient would not benefit in any way from UNI selling DR-70 after Radient's patent expires. That statement makes no sense."

Wolf Says

True it does not make sense..But it will make sense when GCDX and ProvistaDX takeover Radient.Then UniPharma can use the DR-70 combined with LC Sentinel.imo

Lake Said

"Provista's Form D's prove that to be 100% wrong. They specify that the money will NOT be used for a takeover or merger. That money can only be used for ProvistaDx, not for merging with or taking over ANY other company."


Wolf says

True Lake, The form D's do prove your statement. That money is being used for research, as well, Remember in GCDX and Radient Contact, William ststed that GCDX would do and pay for all the studies on DR-70 and LC Sentinel. Really, ProvistaDX can get another offering when the merger is ready to be finalized..It won't take much money..The shares are in safe keeping you understand..imo

Lake Said

"You claim to have bought, and own, a billion shares. That alone is proof that there is no takeover. Under NO circumstances would a takeover group allow you to accumulate that many shares. The best evidence against a takeover is right there, under your nose."

Wolf says

You are wrong. I never stated that I own 1 billion shares.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.