Totally incorrect what?
All that was stated, is how can one possibly know with 100% certainty the status of MIRROR, other than "one patient enrolled", unless one has/had insider info? As "one patient enrolled" is all that has been stated in about 9 months. That is all that was stated. There have been claims made, that more can or is "certain" about MIRRROR and its status, and the simple question was raised, "How" would one know that with "100% certainty" outside of insider info as the trial is not on clinicaltrials.gov for instance and no public "updates" that I'm aware of have ever been given.
Two other trials in the 10-K are stated as needing to be "rinitiate" (which in English would mean they stopped and need to re-start).
But is was pointed out that on clinicaltrials.gov there is a trial, listed right now from BHRT, that says it was "began" around 2007 or something and that "final data/completion" was expected or is stated as "to occur" (guess that's how to understand the .gov site?) and thus it was stated, "what trial would that be"? as one is not aware of any public PR or similar saying to expect a trial to "complete/final data" in Feb of 2014? That was 2 months ago? So which trial is that? That is ALL that was stated and it was stated as an opinion or question as always. I didn't see the word "Marvel" appear anywhere (very well could have missed it) on that trial that apparently is "completed/final data" in Feb. 2014?
Thus, is that is what is being claimed? That Marvel has been "completed" and "final data" was due in Feb 2014? That trial info was updated pretty recently according to the .gov web site? Doesn't match with anything in the 10-K(s) I am aware of ? So, what 170 person trial recently got "final data"- THAT is all that was raised as a question. A question. Cause IMHO it's very confusing? What 170 trial is that, and where/when was it stated in a 10-K or PR or whatever that "final data" occurred 2 months ago? If one knows, then state it? That's all. A QUESTION.
If Marvel (again, don't see that actual word appearing on that .gov page) if Marvel in the 10-K, has not even been "reinitiated" and/or has been "on hold" is what the 10-K seems to say with clarity- then how can the .gov site, which states it was updated as of Jan, 2013 (after a 10-K that said same as this 10-K as far as I remember regarding either Marvel or Regen- aka they are "on hold)- then how was it "expected completion/final data" as of Feb 2014, 2 months ago?
THAT is all that was "asked" as a "question" and is clearly an opinion and/or personal question, clearly stated that the one who asked it, "is confused" or not clear which is which? MIRROR has "one enrolled" and don't know how one can claim to know anymore than that with 100% certainty? And which 170 person trial would have been "updated" fairly recently (Jan 2013) as expecting "final data" when no 10-K or PR or similar seemed to match that "expected date" that I am aware of?
That's it. That's all that was stated/asked and put out as a personal question or opinion- and was clearly stated as such.
