![](https://investorshub.advfn.com/uicon/49001.png?cb=1672684156)
Saturday, April 19, 2014 2:02:18 PM
Sure, why not? Anyone can license a OEM product and re-brand it. Nothing illegal about it.
What needs to be addressed is ntek USING another companies product without permission. We know D.F. knows how to do this well, and has done exactly that over 2 years ago and WILL be going into prison for it.
So my question is, is D.F. yet again, misrepresenting a ntek product illegally to enrich himself and family?
D.F. can calm the board if he is able to provide some verifiable proof of licensing with another company as the np-1 or any other device and come out and admit and detail that the NP isn't his invention. Why all the shadowy secret shit when everyone knows there's a boatload of other companies openly making and marketing the exact same thing.
I don't think I read any ntek pr's yet say they are using a mojo, just alluding to other stuff. Just clear it up already.
FEATURED Element79 Gold Corp. Announces Sale of 100% Interest in Elder Creek, North Mill Creek, and Elephant Projects to 1472886 B.C. Ltd. • Sep 9, 2024 9:34 AM
North Bay Resources Commences Gold Shipments, Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Enters Taber Gold Mine JV, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Sep 9, 2024 9:15 AM
Simple Stock Loans Announces Unique Solutions For Investors Looking for Alternative Liquidity Amidst Recent Small Cap Rally Sep 6, 2024 9:30 AM
Reliant Coffee Debuts at #271 on the Inc. 5000 List of Fastest Growing Companies - Coffee Service Industry Disruptor Brews Up Exponential Growth Sep 5, 2024 11:51 AM
VAYK Confirms Receiving Revenue from First Airbnb Property with 1.4 Million Annual Revenue Goal • VAYK • Sep 4, 2024 9:34 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Expands Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: New Lens Intercepts 21.75 m at 5.25 g/t Gold & 515 ppm Cobalt • MFL • Sep 4, 2024 9:02 AM