InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 261
Posts 19732
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/03/2004

Re: dread50above post# 432

Thursday, 03/09/2006 4:33:47 AM

Thursday, March 09, 2006 4:33:47 AM

Post# of 146235
Reading between the lines for the last 2 PRs, I'd say that there is less than a 10% chance of failure. The real question should be to what degree will they succeed in Vietnam.

All of this assumes, of course, that the NNVC team is not, as shreiked by Matty and Justice on RB, a big scam of lies and misleading PRs. The obvious assumption here must be that those 2 are paid idiots spouting venom for what ever purposes of their respective string pulling higher authorities.

So, my gut feeling is that when the PR reported that the results were far better than they had expected, I took that to mean that the mice had a 100% survival rate under clinical conditions. I also took it mean that there was no need, in the case of H2N1, for an API, since I seem to recall that they were testing micelle bodning to prevent viral entry and infection of new cells. I believe that they were not testing using an API.

Of course, this is all just IMO since virology and chemical engineering are not my areas of expertise.

doc.feelgoode@yahoo.com

"It ain't what they call you, it's what you answer to." --WC Fields


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NNVC News