Wednesday, April 16, 2014 10:37:15 AM
The Post said
"bearspread - Actually, I think if you look I did not say anything about "the Mother of All Short Squeezes".
What I said and was getting at is that to avoid the dividends shorts would have to cover by the COB 4-14, and imo that is valid. **Now what does that amount to? Who knows for sure, not me and I seriously doubt not anyone here.
*How does the divy affect MMs shorting? No real ideal."
There is SOME PART of that which escapes you? Obviously, Sorry.
Have a Great Day, like I said I merely try to flip here and there. The part about any shorts regardless of number being responsible for dividends is an SEC rule, look it up.
See ya, no need for a reply since it hasn't yet 2x now depicted what I posed anyway.
T2M
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM