InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 325
Posts 19225
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 02/08/2002

Re: DragonBear post# 15000

Wednesday, 04/16/2014 10:37:15 AM

Wednesday, April 16, 2014 10:37:15 AM

Post# of 40789
Bears.... Well, seems like you once again are trying to spin my post your way with the conspiracy baloney. Fine, YOU ARE BRILLIANT, there now someone else other than yourself has said so, time to reread things once again. Please try to read the post not just what you want it to say, before you reply.

The Post said

"bearspread - Actually, I think if you look I did not say anything about "the Mother of All Short Squeezes".

What I said and was getting at is that to avoid the dividends shorts would have to cover by the COB 4-14, and imo that is valid. **Now what does that amount to? Who knows for sure, not me and I seriously doubt not anyone here.
*How does the divy affect MMs shorting? No real ideal."


There is SOME PART of that which escapes you? Obviously, Sorry.


Have a Great Day, like I said I merely try to flip here and there. The part about any shorts regardless of number being responsible for dividends is an SEC rule, look it up.


See ya, no need for a reply since it hasn't yet 2x now depicted what I posed anyway.
T2M