InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 73
Posts 9029
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/16/2010

Re: PRmaniac post# 69908

Monday, 04/14/2014 3:11:59 PM

Monday, April 14, 2014 3:11:59 PM

Post# of 130255
I think PM discovered that Colorado companies applying for pot licenses must show that their books are audited.

So, he has come up with the brillant idea to audit Re-Medical Colorado alone. Re-Medical Colorado is an empty shell created one month ago.

At the same time, he speaks of "spinning off" Re-Medical.
This makes very little sense. How is Hop-On supposed to retain ownership (the only way to retain the hypothetical future profits, while "spinning it off" at the same time ?

Will Colorado be satisfied with a audit of a subsidiary, while the parent company's books remain closed ??