InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 48
Posts 2221
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/28/2013

Re: Alleyba1 post# 17050

Sunday, 04/13/2014 9:34:32 PM

Sunday, April 13, 2014 9:34:32 PM

Post# of 24848

it would seem to me that Mr. Zampetti, having recently starting to promote the stock would have had restricted stock, and therefore, he would not have been able to sell any of it at that time, in my opinion.


Pssst, here's a clue: JZ and virtually all of his core cronies were obviously flipping shares that they had acquired on their own, since their free restricted stock was not available for them to dump until Q4. As one of his nitwit footsoldiers even boasted in a post that he enjoyed reaping the benefits of a 10-bagger during the P&D last summer -- in spite of JZ and his core of criminal pumpers swearing up and down that all their shares were locked in a vault. But you already know all this. Don't you tire of constantly putting up the same sorry arguments in defense of known criminals?


So let me ask you a few questions since you are so familiar with the filings and have a pretty good handle on SCRC.........(1) how would you go about or what would yuor strategy be in helping SCRC to establish itself as a player in the area they are in (sector of the market); (2) We all know that SCRC had made some toxic deals with regard to convertible notes, which financing was needed to keep company going. They are now getting rid of those toxic notes. What would you have done if you were in their shoes and how differently would you have done it..........I think those are fair questions.


Certainly, every company's circumstances are unique and a true detailed plan requires access to information that is not available in the public space. That being said, I have many years of experience in the C-suite of both Fortune 100 companies as well as grassroots start-ups, and from this experience, I feel comfortable saying that at a high level:

(1)
Even though SCRC is a penny stock, it needs to stop acting like a penny stock. This means fluffless PR's and forward-looking statements that may not be glitzy and glamorous, but paint an accurate picture that market participants can have faith in, knowing that subsequent SEC filings will materially verify this same story.

(2)
Be patient. If it takes 10 years, then let it take 10 years. Cutting corners is not the way to go just because the CEO has a boatload of shares and wants the sp to rise so he can cash out.

(3)
Don't be afraid of issuing convert notes if predatory lenders are all that your company has access to. Seriously. That is simply the plight of small development stage enterprises. AND THERE IS NO SHAME IN THAT. Read that last sentence again. So long as you are being a good steward of the capital and can clearly demonstrate to shareholders where this capital is going, by and large those who believe in the SCRC story will be fine with it.

(4)
And if RapiMeds truly is on the verge of launching, and the DEA Class II license is on its way, the NJ compounding pharmacy is truly a high earnings contributor, etc, then SCRC should have minimal difficulty attracting true "friendly" financing from VC firms, PE firms, HF's, etc. Assuming that SCRC has not been full of BS (ironic that BS is also the CEO's initials, no?), I would pursue these options.

(5)
Rather than engage petty criminals such as JOSEPH ZAMPETTI and others, I would deploy SCRC's limited capital towards other LEGITIMATE IR-related consulting services, such as (a) Preparing professional looking collateral materials and attending industry/trade shows; (b) Preparing professional looking investor presentations and going on road shows; (c) Exploring M&A opportunities; etc, etc, etc...


NOW, THAT ALL BEING SAID, I have always provided responses to every question/claim that JZ's defenders have attempted to throw up, including your attention-shifting question above. So now I ask yet again: Will you or any of JZ's core associates EVER answer any of the questions I have repeatedly posted? In case you have conveniently forgotten, here they are again:

(1)
What in heaven's name was the investment thesis behind the relentless sense of immediacy and urgency in getting as many new investors as possible into buying into SCRC during Q4 -- when the trend was clearly bearish, unprecendeted dilution was unfolding, and JZ and his gang were coincidentally seeing their 6M shares unlock -- if JZ and his core are now playing it off as "oh, it's always been a longterm play"?

(2)
Where is even ONE Section 17(b) disclosure of JZ's if you and his other defenders continue to deny his criminal status?

(3)
What possible reason could there be for JZ and his core of parasitic scumbags to intentionally decide to violate federal securities law and hide their compensated status from those they are enticing to buy into SCRC? As I posted on in a prior post, I can only come up with one reason -- and it's not pretty. Please do enlighten me on other possible reasons?


****************************

FYI to all SCRC shareholders and potential investors,

SCRC's SEC filings have disclosed the following:

* There were 14 named individuals who were compensated to promote the stock
* There were an unknown number of unidentified individuals described simply as "various" who were compensated to promote the stock
* There were 9 unnammed "designees of JOSEPH ZAMPETTI" who were compensated to promote the stock
* There were 2 dba's (i.e. companies, so individual identities are masked) who were compensated to promote the stock

That's a lot of Section 17(b) violators out there who have intentionally failed to comply with federal securities laws (the laws requiring those who have been paid to promote a stock to disclose their compensated status) and are sitting on millions of zero-cost basis free shares trying to stick their hands into your pockets by convincing you to buy stock that they are looking to dump, most likely during the next runup. The best protection is to stay vigilant and carefully vet the MERITS of everything you read or hear, and attempt to reconcile any claims/assertions against the SEC filings to the best of your abilities -- be it the claimed magnitude of SCRC's short-term potential or any advice to hold/add only and not sell/trade.

GLTA...