Humbly agree, GB, with the following:
Not only that but [HuBob] trying to flex muscle to change or do some kind of clean up is NOT what I understand is his scope of work. It is to moderate the chairmen.
He has been doing precisely that, as far as I can tell, and has said so repeatedly. Click on his profile, read his posts, you will see that is his intention, goal, stated purpose and action.
The problem is not Bob but the change to the concept.
Please explain. I have not seen the concept change.
Also with all this banter for Bob and the site being totally disrupted
IH is functioning very well, as far as I can tell. Have not experienced any disruptions in service at all. Pages load quickly, very few error messages, in short, no problem I can see.
I learned a long time ago to fight and play this game ALONE.
Boy oh boy, is THAT ever a set-up for a one liner! I'll pass. (g) In any case, I agree. Your deleting of posts has proven the fact that you "fight" unfairly, and prefer to have only your voice heard, ALONE.
Cronies typically are your worse enemy in a fight.
No, people that stack the deck in their favor are typically my worst "enemies." Impossible to engage them fairly. Found that mirror yet?
1. If Bob is or has been focused on P&D then that is one of his mistakes mainly because that is the job of the SEC.
Agree -- IF. He has not, as far as I can tell.
2. If Bob is concerned about making changes to an already established concept unchallenged that is another mistake because the right is to challenge.
Absolutely agree! Everyone's voice should be heard. Why did you delete my post? I had the right to challenge your statements! Very hypocritical action on your part!
3. If Bob is behind all this nonsense then he has another problem because he is not doing his job.
What nonsense? I have read nonsense here, but not in HuBob's posts. Found the mirror yet?
You people have no idea what you are doing and I can tell you from experience that Bob needs to polish bats and chase baseballs or bat.
You talking to me? Am I one of the "you people?" If so, I have a pretty good idea as to what I am humbly doing. And I do not believe you to be qualified to tell HuBob what he should do with his life. You can suggest, as can I. His call in the end.
This is a stock site for the most part
Agree.
and not a Bob debate site
Agree.
and should Bob be allowed to establish Bob's World
No, he should not, and has not. He has tried to create a level playing field and has said precisely that.
so the SI factor can invade and disrupt
Do not believe HuBob would allow that, at all! He has not, up to now.
under the knowledge that you have the right to just bad mouth all you want and get away with it.
HuBob has NEVER tolerated any of the above, to the best of my knowledge. Don't see why he would start now.
That is not going to happen
Agree.
and if it does then Bob;s World will be totaly established
IF. IF that were the case, I'd be the first to speak up!
and IHUB's concept will be totally undermined
Agree, would be.
and SI has been reinvented.
Disagree. IH would become worthless, but would not reflect the SI model, at all.
Think about it. The problem is not Bob it is the SI Factor wanting what they had on SI
No. Speaking for myself, if I wanted to post on SI, I would. I would not be here. I am here because I trust HuBob will succeed in making IH a level playing field. If he does not, I will leave. "SI factor" has nothing to do with it (whatever it is), as far as I am concerned.
under his selective bias admin practices.
That is your view, not mine. Although I have been suspended by HuBob on numerous occasions, I find his admin practices to be beyond reproach by me.
Cheers,
Svejk
