InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 290
Posts 85310
Boards Moderated 63
Alias Born 02/06/2005

Re: Huckleberry Pieman post# 269758

Thursday, 04/10/2014 7:16:22 PM

Thursday, April 10, 2014 7:16:22 PM

Post# of 275590
MUEL

for those that argue against MUEL, another thing that I think has contributed to the low valuation that I think will change in 2014, is I expect too see solid revenue growth in 2014 versus 2013, I think this is something that has adversely affected the PE on MUEL. it is seen as a cost cutting value, low PE Pink story. I think in 2014 with continuing improvement in the balance sheet which was a concern a year ago, and solid revenue growth I expect revs to be 47-50 million in q1 which will finally show significant y/y revenue growth, remember q1 is generally there weakest quarter so I expect it too most likely ramp up from here, we are in an improving economy and I wouldn't be surprised to see $3+ fully taxed quarters at some point in 2014. Of course I could always be wrong, but MUEL is just waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too attractive at these levels, I feel pe expansion is Going to be the story in 2014, and I expect to see significantly higher price in 2014. All is just my opinion, and I could always be wrong though.

---All above is just my humble opinion.
And I could always be wrong.
And as always do your own DD.---
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=5316

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.