Exobox Technologies Corp (EXBX)

[ADVFN_notsomuch]

What was wrong with a broke company retaining anywhere from 27% to 33% of the authorized stock and doing a merger with another company or bringing in new technology?

Wasn't there a post on this Board that a normal reverse split would be about 1 for 100 or a 93% dilution of stock ownership, when in reality the adjusted proposed reverse split on the 2010 proxy was only about 29% dilution or about 6 times better deal?

I think the Skipper/Copeland proposed reverse split left about 12% of the company in the hands of shareholders which was about 1/3 of the reverse split on the proxy... Isn't that true?