InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 3418
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/10/2003

Re: Tenchu post# 25561

Tuesday, 03/07/2006 1:47:19 AM

Tuesday, March 07, 2006 1:47:19 AM

Post# of 151836
Tenchu,

You can see my point here. The 'Droids aren't upset over bogus marketing deals. They're just upset over those that AMD isn't a part of.

Specifically those that are in violation of the Clayton Act.

It is possible that there will be a day when Intel investors will be upset about Intel's violations of Clayton Act as well. But today, many Intel investors are cheering for Intel's violations of Clayton act.

What I am missing here are level headed Intel investors, who would applaud Intel's achievements on technological level, on merit (if any) and condemn violations of Clayton Act (among others) - and demand that the management stops them immediately. Ongoing violations of Clayton act (see Skype) result in an additional risk to Intel (as an investment).

Joe
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INTC News