InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 116
Posts 33340
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 12/25/2002

Re: xe2dy post# 9420

Sunday, 03/05/2006 11:55:17 PM

Sunday, March 05, 2006 11:55:17 PM

Post# of 195728
Hi XE, anything is possible. Obviously I am no military planner 8^) but I would think these would be used in a crowd dispersion type scenario, not a preemptive strike scenario. It could be that these gunships are to prevent a civil war from breaking out as hinted at by the article you posted.

>>>At this stage, only a direct and immediate action on the part of the US administration aimed at preventing a military confrontation with Iran<<<

"Preventing" is the optimal word. Dialogue has never been a GWB strong point. Hell, who we kidding, Bush don't do dialogue and Iran is not making this any easier. Why should they? They have been indicted as part of the Axis of Evil and probably felt they were next on the hit list for some time now. They also probably feel as though they have nothing to lose and everything to gain by creating instability. It is a rallying cry...

A confrontation is just about certain; when and in what way, shape or form is to be determined. A preemptive strike would most likely incorporate tactical nukes.

**Happy Trading**

Your Economy #board- 1948

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.