InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 3435
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/05/2003

Re: None

Sunday, 03/05/2006 9:41:43 PM

Sunday, March 05, 2006 9:41:43 PM

Post# of 6903
Interesting little tidbits of data from Charlie re: Conroe vs. Hammer:
-----------------------------------------------
http://www.aceshardware.com/forums/read_post.jsp?id=115156611&forumid=1

Mikem wrote:

A Conroe is 20% faster then a Hammer clock for clock.
A Conroe E6600 316$ is as fast as a AMD 5000+ 2,6Ghz,
AMD is usually 10% cheaper then Intel, so a AMD AM2 5000+ would cost 285$.

Nope, not clock for clock. Bzzzt! Next.
-----------------------------------------------
http://www.aceshardware.com/forums/read_post.jsp?id=115156650&forumid=1
Eric Bron wrote:

Mikem wrote:


Intel Conroe 65Watt
E8xxx: 3.33 GHz / FSB 1333/ 4 MB shared L2 cache 1000$
E6300: 1.86 GHz / FSB 1066/ 2 MB shared L2 cache 209$


(Eric Bron)- Same TDP for these two ? you're a really optimistic guy, aren't you ?


XE has a much higher TDP. Twitboy is factually wrong. Again.

-Charlie

---------------------------------------

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.