InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 48
Posts 970
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/03/2008

Re: MicroKing post# 41024

Saturday, 04/05/2014 12:12:27 AM

Saturday, April 05, 2014 12:12:27 AM

Post# of 111719
One more point, If a "REPO 105" is a nontransferable asset then the assets would be owned by the OBS.

A few cases accepted/settlements to be part of the OBS. Why would anyone want to be part of the OBS if they had a disputed/allowed claim that would/could be discharged?

Too many parties want to be apart of the OBS to dismiss. I'm sure CottonisKing understands.