InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,973.10
(
0.74%
)
US TECH 100
20,469.20
(
-0.35%
)
Dow Jones
43,729.34
(
0.00%
)
Brent Oil
74.58
(
-1.17%
)
Bitcoin
76,275.12
(
0.49%
)
Post# of 19309
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

shears

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 194
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/17/2005

shears

Re: DewDiligence post# 4738

Thursday, 08/23/2007 11:18:52 PM

Thursday, August 23, 2007 11:18:52 PM

Post# of 19309
I decided to bite my tongue till I saw the paper. Why would anyone tout these kind of results? They're not worth the paper being printed on. Boy I wish my name was listed at the end. I'd be famous. Manipulating Protein C doesn't really effect outcomes in sepsis, does it? The mortality p values were likely .8 or thereabouts. This reminds me of the crap Boston Sci was putting out in the stent wars, only their data was way better. This paper buries itself by trying to bury the mortality data. What a piece of crap. I really don't know doodly when it comes to statistics but I can smell a rat when I see one.

Can anyone name one insurance company that would throw good money down the drain to pay for someone to get ART-123 before they die?

"Here lies Darryl
His DIC numbers are tops in the cemetary
and he didn't bleed from heparin
RIP"
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up