InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 833
Posts 119844
Boards Moderated 17
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: None

Friday, 04/20/2007 6:39:00 PM

Friday, April 20, 2007 6:39:00 PM

Post# of 19309
Comparison of Lovenox and Antithrombin
Versus Antithrombin Alone for the Prevention
of Symptomatic VTE In Children With Acute
Lymphoblastic Leukemia


[Note that AT is used in both arms of this study; the variable is the use of Lovenox (enoxaparin).]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Select+from+History&query_key=2&WebEnv=05_...

>>
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007 Apr 18

Meister B, Kropshofer G, Klein-Franke A, Strasak AM, Hager J, Streif W.

Department of Pediatrics, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria.

BACKGROUND: Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have a substantial risk for thromboembolism (TE) that is related to L-asparaginase-induced antithrombin (AT) deficiency and placement of central venous lines. Recent in vitro studies showed that the anticoagulant effects of low-molecular-weight heparin were profoundly affected by endogenous AT levels in children undergoing ALL therapy.

METHODS: A total of 112 consecutively recruited children with newly diagnosed ALL treated according to BFM 95/2000 protocols were enrolled in this trial. This prospective cohort study was carried out to determine the influence of combined low molecular weight heparin-prophylaxis (enoxaparin 1 mg/kg/ per day) and AT supplementation versus AT alone (non-contemporaneous control group) on the incidence of symptomatic TE during a follow-up of 240 days.

RESULTS: To maintain AT plasma levels above 50%, nearly 60% of all children needed at least one, most children two or three AT supplementations during induction therapy. 12.7% of the children that did receive only AT-prophylaxis (n = 71) (95% CI = 6.0-22.7) developed objectively confirmed symptomatic TE, as compared with no TE in children after combined prophylaxis (n = 41) (95% CI = 0.0-8.6, P < 0.05). Thromboses were located in the sinovenous system in the brain (n = 3), the lower deep veins (n = 3), the upper deep veins (n = 2) and in an upper deep vein combined with pulmonary embolism (n = 1).

CONCLUSION: Prophylaxis with enoxaparin was safe and effective in preventing TE. Although our data are encouraging, the in vivo efficacy of combined enoxaparin and AT prophylaxis to prevent symptomatic venous TE in children with ALL should be evaluated in a prospective randomized clinical trial.
<<

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.