InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 44
Posts 4595
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/19/2006

Re: None

Saturday, 08/05/2006 11:20:42 AM

Saturday, August 05, 2006 11:20:42 AM

Post# of 19309
jessellivermore et. al.,
here's a link to the JAMA piece:

http://scalpel.stanford.edu/articles/AT3.pdf

the comments are helpful..they reference mulitple phase II designs in ATIII that showed promise, cite issues related to study design/patient popultaion (higher than expected ATIII levels at baseline), lower than expected therapeutic levels of ATIII achieved with dosages used (which were arbitrary and NOT titrated to ATIII consumption/levels in individual patients), and the statistically significant finding in the no-heparin group. While i am wary of data mining and subgroup analyses in general, the no heparin group was defined a priori and has a biologic rationale for undermining ATIII efficacy (interfereing with glycosaminoglycan binding, etc.)

I actually come away thinking there is a good chance for success in the DIC trial, especially with careful design, titration of dose, omitting heparin, and including long-term follow up data (which showed the more dramatic differences between study groups)

I am not in the critical care field, but I am also encouraged by fact ATIII is already used in this setting in many places where it is more readily available





Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.