InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,571.49
(
0.08%
)
US TECH 100
19,868.80
(
0.11%
)
Dow Jones
39,329.99
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
85.48
(
-1.19%
)
Bitcoin
56,319.17
(
0.85%
)
Post# of 79921
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

quiet

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 11
Posts 3518
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/11/2005

quiet

Re: mthead post# 20215

Tuesday, 08/01/2006 8:47:18 AM

Tuesday, August 01, 2006 8:47:18 AM

Post# of 79921
Yeah. You're right, its not a good explanation. When I read the 7/7 press release I looked at "land leases" as being the value of the property including mineral reserves since it immediately followed the sand and gravel reserve estimate.

That item definitely could use clarification. Probably has more to do with old valuations carried forward but can't be sure without asking.

I'll see if I can get an answer.

___________________________
Speak softly and carry a big schtick.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up