Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Blackbridge Capital paid 0.000005 each for 824,345,000 shares. If they can dump them all at .0001 they came out alright.
Who the hell takes out notes for $600.00? LOL
Email and tweet blasts and a promo campaign started April 27, 2016.
https://www.otcdynamics.com/bssp-bassline-productions-inc-promotional-campaign-starting-apr-27-2016-444-am-cst/
The DD posted may suggest what YOU think but I have not seen anything from the company other than the CEO is Dennis R Alexander
Dennis always claims he cannot get institutional investors unless the pps is above a nickel so he does at least a 1 for 500 RS. If that don't hold he does a 1 for 1500. Seen this CEO do this many many times. The alternative is toxic financing. What is your choice?
BSSP has stage 4 share cancer and it's multiplying quick.
Next could be a new ticker and license specific to Zika Virus in Brazil only.
Nothing like having unlimited A/S. Sweet
I dunno but the corporate status of this CIK is:
Status: Dissolved
****NEWS****
REVE TECHNOLOGIES FILES CORPORATE ACTION OF DISSOLUTION (BSSP)
Action Type: Dissolution
Document Number: 20160244334-49 # of Pages: 1
File Date: 5/27/2016 Effective Date:
(No notes for this action)
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=7lQLN0ZHMu5IDsw7e2MN%252fg%253d%253d&CorpName=REVE+TECHNOLOGIES%2c+INC.
A sell... Odd lot of 244,594,995 shares likely someone who closed out a position. Looks like they were in a hurry.
It was those damn shorters again.
That depends on what you call successful.
He was in the middle of a merger of (Co "A") with a British company (Co "B") to get access to the foreign markets. In the middle of that process Co "B" got delisted so he sold 35% of assets of Co "A" into a shell (Co "C") that was registered in Canada and the US with a share swap. Co "A",s shares were already diluted 20 billion and worthless. As it turns out Co "C" was banned in Canada so he found another shell (Co "D") in Ontario which was another stock swap.
Each of these deals resulted in Mr Alexander as the CEO. The kicker is that the deals were negotiated between Mr Alexander and Mr Alexander by a consulting company soley owned by Mr Alexander.
Each of these companies pays rent to the owner of Smoke Tree Lane (Mr Alexander)
Each of these companies pays salary to the same CEO (Mr Alexander)
Each of these companies pays a retainer to the same consultant (Mr Alexander)
Each paid large number of shares to Mr Alexander for making such a hard deal happen. YES Alexander, Alexander and Alexander.
The purpose of all of the companies was to raise money to drill a oil well in an old depleted oilfied. I can say that he raised at least 10 times over the amount yet each of the companies are broke. Successful depends on what kind of paper you end up with at the end. Dollar bills or stock certs of a no-bid or suspended company.
Where did you get that info? Nevada SOS still shows Dennis as CEO of EFIR and his deceased mother as secretary.
How do you screen shot a phone call? I wanna try that.
Not that I recall. PPS always goes up AFTER a RS. Never seen a run before a RS. There was a run from .0001 to 0.0033
when 3 shares traded in January of 2014 though. Same 1 cent close out of pos.
Just sayin this CEO means bad news. I can't imagine a legitimate company getting in bed with this guy. You can make money on the worst stocks ever but you better be quick.
Oh no. It traded as high as .51 after a RS
I was responding to a post stating gains in 2012.
That was on 05/03/2016 when one share traded that day. Someone closed their position of one share left from multiple reverse splits, I'm sure. The subject was the year 2012 btw.
Zhabilov was a basher of his own company.
Interesting that Zhabilov is known to post in internet chat rooms as brought up when his former employer sued him.
1. Unless otherwise specified, all further statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure.
2. Keledjian's declaration does allege that "Zhabilov embarked on a scheme in 2006 while serving as an officer and director of VGI to post in investor chatrooms derogatory comments about VGI to drive away potential and actual investors." Although these allegations arguably involve a protected activity, (see ComputerXpress, Inc. v. Jackson (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 993, 1005-1008 [posting comments in internet chat room regarding publicly-traded company constituted protected activity]), Zhabilov has never asserted that VGI's claims are based on his chatroom postings nor has he argued that VGI's complaint should be stricken as a result of these allegations. Instead, he has argued only that VGI's claims should be stricken because they are predicated on his participation in the Illinois litigation. We therefore need not consider whether VGI's "chat room" allegations might provide an independent basis for striking some or all of VGI's claims under section 425.16. (See Paterno v. State of California (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 68, 106 ["court is not required to examine undeveloped claims, nor to make arguments for parties"].)
Ref:
http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20CACO%2020101026010/VIRAL%20GENETICS,%20INC.%20v.%20ZHABILOV
I believe that is Dennis R Alexander's sig.
May be just a technicality that can be contested but the filing requires a signature from an officer. Dennis is not registered as an officer with the Nevada SOS. Here is what was filed;
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1495028/000159406216000374/reveamend.jpg
The SOS should have requested an update to the annual list before processing this form.
Quite frankly, I don't know how he can raise authorized shares since he is not authorized. He is not recognized as an officer or agent in Nevada for this CIK. He will need to get flush with the SOS to do anything.
1,731,987 shares in 8 trades.
Price Size Type C T Bid Offer Time
0.0012 10,000 0.001 0.0012 15:44:08
0.0012 10,000 0.001 0.0012 15:43:58
0.0012 376,987 0.001 0.0012 15:43:53
0.0012 985,000 0.001 0.0012 15:39:04
0.0012 10,000 0.001 0.0012 15:26:30
0.0012 305,400 0.001 0.0012 15:26:19
0.0012 14,600 0.001 0.0012 15:26:11
0.0012 20,000 0.0011 0.0012 15:25:29
0.0011 10,000 0.001 0.0011 15:18:47
0.001077 5,000 0.001 0.0011 10:28:07
0.00106 2,500,000 cash 0.001 0.0011 8:43:54
Did you notice .....converted a portion of a Convertible Promissory Note ....
Meaning that there are a lot more conversions to be done.
Because the business license expires on Tuesday. Whether it is renewed or not would be news.
Chris Schmersal is his name.
It pays to ask correctly.
Ouch. That would indicate the deal has not been consummated.
Thanks, OBA. Maybe we can get this put in the I-box
I don't think so. Vasquez was paid in shares and became disgruntled because there was no market for them. I think he may still be linked through the little known about yacht business though.
Yeah. I'm gonna get me one of those for my West coast operations.
Either way... Dennis is in Arizona. Feel free to drop in on San Clemente
I don't suppose he told you that BSSP's office was a $95 per month virtual office.
https://www.abcn.com/offices-huntington-beach-california-beach-blvd.-117
With everyone watching that Dr. Oz video, you would think this would be a buck by now.
He has filed false info in the past in 8Ks 10Ks and 10Qs and actually busted at least twice in the past. The sanctions from the SEC were a lot less than the risk/benefit. I think the last monetary fine was $50K but the company gets to pay that, not the individual.
I am not saying the BSSP filing is false but it smells deceptive.
The easy answer is.... in $0.0002 installments.
Alexander probably didn't want to remove Forster officially until the company was clean.
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on August 6, 2015, it filed a subpoena enforcement action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Michael J. Forster ("Forster"), and that the Court entered an order directing Forster to show cause why he should not be ordered to comply with the subpoena that he received. According to the application and supporting papers, the SEC is investigating whether Forster and others have violated or are violating anti-fraud or other provisions of the federal securities laws in connection with the touting of various microcap issuers.
The SEC's application alleges that Forster touted the stocks of microcap issuers that were subject to pump-and-dump schemes, and that Forster furthered the schemes by paying undisclosed compensation to others to manipulatively trade in the stocks he was touting. The SEC's staff is investigating the involvement of other persons and entities in these and related schemes.
As part of its investigation, the staff in the SEC's New York Regional office served Forster with a document subpoena in February 2015. The SEC's application alleges that Forster repeatedly refused to produce any documents in response to the subpoena, notwithstanding multiple efforts by the SEC to secure his voluntary compliance. The SEC's application seeks an order from the federal district court compelling Forster to comply fully with the subpoena. The SEC is continuing its fact-finding investigation and, to date, has not concluded that anyone has violated the securities laws.
The same address is used for Michael and David.
I'm don't think anyone at the company other than David Forster has the authority to make a name change. He is the only active officer per Nevada SOS.
Google "Cease and desist, Dr. OZ" and you will see why the video has been removed.
The Purchase Shares are to be non-dilutable per agreement. You do not own purchase shares so your shares are dilutable. This just means that Canteck will maintain 54.05% of shares no matter how many new shares are issued. If the company issues 20 billion new shares then it must give the majority to the holder of the non-dilutable shares. This type of agreement signals that the company plans to issue new shares but it's a way to hold a majority control for itself.
If you insist on buying at .0003 when the ask is .0002 I am sure if bypass electronic trading and call a shady broker that he can make that happen for you.