Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Koog...see that my other message here is deleted too plus this one when board moderators are here tomorrow.
Yes stick with a real company INTC-Intel...I have known HDVY forever and yes it is being pumped and should move well tomorrow but it won't hold.
HDVY maybe a fast run but don't get caught holding it.
I have held that stock for 15 years waiting on exit. I don't believe many understand the Primary class and of course sub class /other when reading patents. That is all that exist as to recognition that HDVY got their patent back. It takes a real company with the right officers and of course massive institutional buying, not to mention products. Yes, is it possible that Intel needs this patent to incorporate within their many chips? could be but history of HDVY IS SAD, REAL SAD.
Big Beef if this was 2000 all over indeed, I wouldn't even move off my butt for $30k swings in profits back then but man things are different these days so I'll happily grab off the table these dayS. My biggest loss two of them back to back $480k and never got that back, what the heck!
Nathan, Intel changed the patent 3 plus time to accommodate the damn USPTO but the problem actually started because the dude working on clearances to alicate or refuse that patent did not have enough knowledge in this are to understand it.
When these patents are written it is done in a way that every part in the wording and combinations (to say the least) is call "teach" meaning a "teaching fact" or it is refused. 8 plus years ago and especially in 2003 this technology was light years ahead of so much (damn I'm getting pissed) Anyways when Intel was awarded the patent HDC copied in an filed it with the USPTO to create a Interference so the patent office would look at the problem but in short the USPTO screwed up.
Later time for Nascar
Excellent : ).eom
As I recall October 9 or 12 of 2018 case reopened
Follow my link
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147249248
That is false, people are also not understanding the "primary class" and for a bad word "sub class" or "other" in the patent. Oh, I almost forgot plus understanding "kind code
Nothing personal
MBMoney...this is starting to look good too!
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147231837
Big beef go to my information page, moderating new message board.
Moderator here please leave my post for 1 hour if possible then delete my message, TIA
Good Sport, if memory serves which it doesn't at times Cramer was approached about HDVY years ago however, if Cramer has it out for Intel he might create another big run here. The more I think about the past I believe that "Suporrt Vector Machine" (SVM) was brought to his attention. Damn many years ago so I'm not sure?
Rocket...you do recall Qualcomm but with that being said I personally don't believe Intel would be able to push the needed Althigrams fast enough however, I am sure Intel is using the patent for medical gene purpose.
Lets light it up!.eom
Imperativity, Scott Tobin would have been our perfect CEO but as you recall the BS.
__________________________________________________________
Nice to see you again...are you not missing a smoking pipe from your alias information page.
King Oil not sure but money talks and BS walks however, is it also possible that Intel could lose a larger playing field not to have this resolved quickly due to HDC future patent developments. In other words further development on that patent are probably being developed. Patent development never stops with a patent they are continued and developed further.
Grant you I haven't recently checked to see what development any of our patent inventors have done simply because I thought for sure that HDC would lose the fight with Intel.
I must say that I feel that Intel super sized that patent further and if Weston viewed it as such no doubt he might be modifying 7,685,077 even FURTHER for FUTURE technologies so yes in many ways maybe Intel should not prolong this event any further and do business with HDC however, all this must still tie into HDC dealings with NeoGenomic corporation.
Technology is just that but HDC is not capable of handling such a feat but yes Intel or perhaps NeoGenomic could. BTW... our present CEO is not capable for this type of operation nor is his daughter.
I just hope "Stephen D Barnhill" doesn't stick his nose in our business again but won't put it past him. (I have no respect for barnhill so I would never address him as a doctor of anything except of destruction.
I know the entire history and I know who I would bring in to transact everything. I will not go back into my records just yet but he also worked at Quest years ago. He even sued Barnhill as I recall..but there is more to that story. Right now I want to setup for Mondays run.
No I am not talking about "William Quirk the 3rd"...actually I believe he has died last time I checked?
I just found the past officer R. Scott Tobin would be one to run this company.
Big Beef, Non reporting is non reporting regardless of share price and being grounded allows for clear thinking in most cases.
Big Beef, this has my full attention in a big way, I have my strategy in place.
Not necessarily true, it depend upon past, present and future income sources.eom
Big Beef...you sell when ever you so desire. You have seen the traders come and go and they did Friday too, marrying stocks and hitting it big is extremely stupid but everyone at least me looks to find that diamond in the rough. Why not let to pump go foreword Monday as we have nothing to lose and everything to gain. I mean look where we were so what the heck. I do like the idea of selling half but since I didn't ever pull money off the table to at least cover my expenses I must look at all that today.
I posted last December I had "Quad bypass surgery" heck I will be 69 soon and was 52 years old when I first invested here. I didn't want to just trade in and out here because future potential would be huge but "The Barnhill Shuffle" screwed us all bigtime. I figured later on when Dr. Albitar left HDC for NeoGenomics was cool until NeoGenomics corporation press released that he would be exclusively working under and within NeoGenomic then and then only did I sense the last nail in our coffin lid.
Yes indeed let them crank this engine up as we have nothing to lose.
Big Beef that is correct and I doubt very much if you sold your position unless it was Friday and don't blame you if you did. The history has burnt us for many years...at least my 15 years but it does look good but money problems plus being a pink sheets speaks loud too.
I need to study this further to see if the USPTO will extend the date of the patent due to time during litigation/reexamination.
https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s2265.html
If indeed Intel has been using this patent for products Intel will no doubt do so. I say this due to many facts facing each company. My other thought would be that Intel would also purchase the rest of the patent portfolio. I do wonder about the wasted years if that accounts for any follow through monies for HDC. Also would the USPTO extend the date of our patent due to years lost? Maybe watch this later at http://www.freepatentsonline.com
I am a bit curious about about our arbitration with NeoGenomics, if we allow Intel to buy HDC patent portfolio or combined with HDC corporation how would that affect our current/possibly future arbitration case 3:17-cv-00752 https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147231837
Here are a few web links that some may wish to read. Do note in the first link the word "REGRESSION"
https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/improving-svm-performance-with-intel-daal
https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/bigdata/topic/714855
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1526004
It really does look like Intel needs the SVM-RFE - RFE-SVM for possibly their future chips and also the Bio-informatics
I don't believe this will go to anything close to .60 cents next week but this is bigger than I had thought, I have been here since May of 2003.
Here are a few court descriptions of direct information in the arbitration case between NEO and HDC. What is interesting on October 15th it is stated by the court that Dr. Albitar must provide deposition whereas our past CEO Mr. Kowbel's does not. The judge denied it. If i get time I will try to see if anything is new about this.
Monday, October 15, 2018
51 4 pgs order Order on Motion to Take Deposition Mon 2:29 PM
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 44 Motion to Take Depositions. The Clerk shall issue a subpoena for Dr. Albitar's deposition.
The Motion is denied as to the issuance of a subpoena for Mr. Kowbel's deposition. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate
Judge Monte C. Richardson on 10/15/2018. (MMP)
Tuesday, October 09, 2018
50 3 pgs order Order on Motion to Reopen Case Tue 5:20 PM
ORDER granting 41 Corrected Joint Motion to Re-Open Case and For Other Relief. The Court adopts the Agreed HIPAA Qualified Protective Order
and Order to Disclose Protected Health Information, which is attached to this Order. The case shall remain administratively closed pending
arbitration. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 10/9/2018. (SEJ)
Att: 1 Agreed HIPAA Qualified Protective Order and Order to Disclose Protected Health Information
Monday, October 08, 2018
49 notice Notice (Other) Mon 5:02 PM
NOTICE by NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc. re44 Joint MOTION to Re-Open Case for Issuance of Subpoenas(Simonitsch, William)
Att: 1 Exhibit A
Yes indeed.eom
I have a million dollars that says you are so wrong.eom
Excellent post : )))oem
I am not about to go back and even look at all the warrants but don't believe they were just set on a strike price. I could be wrong but thought the stock must maintain a certain share price for so many days??? Also if they are being a warrant the share price must climb too.
Mike...cut the BS back a bit and some just might believe you, sincerely, I mean harm just a small learning cure
King Oil...I just was able to login and looks good for the trades but longs I doubt meaning possibly Monday with Tuesday or Wednesday being the latest traders will use the 45 minute rule and dump. I actually need to check my records that pertain to that rule since I hardly can recall it at present. I myself as said prior if indeed I reach my break even point I am leaving after living here since May of 2003. Those 5 accounts will again look good as my main interest is those 2 Roth account once again. I think I will go back and read all of today's messages as it looks like 60 plus to quickly read then outside to work a bit. It does look like I may need to see my break even point sometime prior close of the bell. I also need to see if HDC has filed something else today which will tell something else I need to know plus any new filings....later
Now that is a clear fact.eom
King Oil, all I want to do is break even and leave yet I don't recall that exit point but think it was around .17 -.22 per share. I have many cheap shares but did buy some around .40 - .50 if I recall. I will probably be looking into those records over the coming weekend. I have been here since May of 2003 prior HDC.
Something I'm not understanding is the fact that the USPTO issued the patent to Intel. It was the fault of the USPTO not Intel? What am I
missing as to why Intel would just pay us money aside from the possibility of them wanting to purchase our patent. HDC would probably allow a purchase since HDC (the company) is basically in the bucket however, I am sure if this were 2010-2012 HDC would no doubt just license the patent(s).
No doubt I will be close and watching as I'm long retired, interesting I place most of this in 2 roth accounts and 3 retail accounts. I'm going to check out the yahoo thread and a few others if they are still around. Talk at you later.
INTEL Corporation loses to Health Discovery Corps.
https://acts.uspto.gov/ifiling/PDFfromDocumentum?No=106066&seqNo=149
https://acts.uspto.gov/ifiling/PDFfromDocumentum?No=106066&seqNo=148
Clint Eastwood make my day, memory is slow but smiling since I was able to finally figure out web links for those who could not
view earlier, or should I say I believe everyone can now read the documents.
There were other factors in the case that counter events from both parties but the main course comes back as simply said as this HDC filing dates were 5-8 months prior Intel's filing.
https:// verse http:// also pdf files
Click on weblink then click file contents the you should see the 2 files. If you were able to do this process months ago then perhaps your software needs to be adjusted. I am using Window 7 still plus firefox and webroots complete plus I do not allow cookies.
https://acts.uspto.gov/ifiling/PublicView.jsp?identifier=106066&identifier2=null&tabSel=1&action=filewrapper&replyTo=PublicView.jsp
I can not format these documents as I have done years ago sorry getting too damn old
If Intel wishes to buy the patent than maybe so?
...and one other thing it was the patent office that screwed up and issued the patent to Intel so why would Intel pay us any monies? Each party would probably just go on their own way as prior the dispute.
Look as I see it probably nothing and here is why. Correct me if you feel differently.
Firstly has Intel tried to stop us from using that patent? Do we have anyone using that patent property? Has anyone company cancelled any real dealings with HDC as a result of the patent legal actions?
And to say the least where is the press release showing how excited HDC is???
A reply to my last post!!!! I honestly thought we didn't have a chance to win this case however, I think it is far too late for HDC
We did!
Interference 106,066 (JTM) – Li v. Weston – Judgment
The Board has dismissed all pending motions. Paper 148. Li’s earliest alleged priority date of July 20, 2006 (Paper 23) is after Weston’s accorded priority date of January 31, 2005.
Accordingly, Li cannot prevail on priority. Accordingly, It is ORDERED that judgment on priority is entered against junior party Li as to Count 1, the sole Count, of the interference. Paper 1, 5. FURTHER ORDERED that claims 1–15 of Li patent 7,685,077C1 are cancelled. 35 U.S.C. § 135(a); FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are directed to 35 USC § 135(c) and Bd. R. 205 regarding the filing of settlement agreements; FURTHER ORDERED that a party seeking judicial review timely serve notice on the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. 37 C.F.R. §§ 90.1 and 104.2. See also Bd. R. 8(b); Attention is directed to Biogen Idec MA, Inc., v. Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 785 F.3d 648, 654–57 (Fed. Cir. 2015) (determining that pre-AIA § 146 review was eliminated for interference proceedings declared after September 15, 2012); and FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be entered into the administrative records of the involved Li patent and Weston application.