Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
We (HDC) are getting played like a fiddle over and over again!
Big Beef...nice thank you for the site ...][oh no big deal with the noise from you know who!besides some will forget more with age than young ones can ever learn.
...Oh, I wonder who couldn't remember their old password to login to Ihub? ; )
Big Beef, basically a 300k short was covered on 9/27 so that lead to the start of the rise, lets hope the rise continues.
Big Beef...now don't forget about this until we see something in a SEC filing. I mentioned this back in September....https://www.sccapitalpartnersinc.com/about-us/ Were they part of a loan involving all the legal stuff with NEO/Intel or perhaps a possible merger? We have seen no mention of them nor can I find anything in our past filings. It does seem they may have been the avenue we used to supply us money in our past fight!!! May they are not done financing yet? They also could be used as an avenue to obtain filing status again...from the reading I have done referencing those who wish to become active within SEC filings.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=150908612
Big Beef....NITE will handle E-trade & TD Ameritrade, ETFR will/can handle "retail" trades. Now CDEL may only sell to brokers and not retail I am not sure about them. It depends who was up to bat involving bid/ask late today. I cut out around 2pm today so I don't know? No doubt if NITE couldn't see you as ETFR generally leaves early specially on Fridays.
A old message for you.....
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=124857683
152,337 HDC trades today
Time Price Volume
15:59:03 0.095 2000
15:58:46 0.0805 22000
15:46:23 0.09 10337
15:40:56 0.095 10000
15:40:51 0.098 2500
15:40:47 0.09 12000
12:18:50 0.095 5000
12:17:37 0.09 27000
12:16:26 0.09 1000
12:16:22 0.08851 1000
11:52:04 0.09 10000
11:41:39 0.09 555
11:41:39 0.09 9245
11:41:38 0.09 27700
11:41:36 0.09 10000
09:30:03 0.09 2000
https://www.barchart.com/stocks/quotes/HDVY/opinion
Ou71764...I see the next days trades (typical 9:30:02 sharp) as a continuation from near close prior day, at least from checking my data.
I do suspect in the old days as a possible signal which you are aware of too but doubt now nor within the present trading structure of dealers, MMs and brokers. If you note many of these players on L2 will do the deed yet you do not see the share amounts change from bid/ask volume however you will see some of these so called dealers close early and leave trading. Just maybe when they walked out an order wasn't complete in some manner plus with a little bit of share left over they can tabulate or even manipulate things out of the gate during the next morning?
These are my thoughts?
Just maybe but??? When I talked about ETRF MM/Dealer they were E-trade years ago. E-trade sold their MM business to Susquehanna International Group around 6 plus years ago? ETRF is now G1 Execution Service but is owned by Susquehanna International Group. Susquehanna's headquarters is located in Pennsylvania : ) Less than 17 miles from our CEO's home.
Don't forget I mentioned that I felt ETRF was making a market for us and stated it was from reviewing all me trading information since August.
I'll talk with you later going to jump on some machinery for a couple of hours.
32,025 HDC trades today.
Time Price Volume
15:33:25 0.09 1000
15:33:04 0.09 2000
15:33:02 0.09 3000
15:31:48 0.0806 12000
15:31:45 0.0806 10000
09:51:05 0.09 2000
09:30:07 0.09 2000
09:30:00 0.09 25
Hey I'm fine no problem at all I just need to think about other people besides myself. I will post days end when things as to volume starts to change. We are still north of the 50 yard line and I'm watching.
The following will may help some understand the differences between being delisted by the SEC or by HDC. We are just DARK as indicated weeks ago. The CEO technically doesn't need to even throw an 8-K bone to use but still tries. This link is large lettering and easier to read.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/files/ellenoff-going-dark.pdf
Ou71764...I doubt we are going any where close to filing with the SEC until the following can be meant.
SEC Delinquent Filers Program
In 2004 the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) instituted the Delinquent Filers Program and created the Delinquent Filers Branch as part of its Division of Enforcement. The Delinquent Filers Branch was instituted to encourage publicly traded companies that are delinquent in the filing of their required periodic reports (Forms 10-K and 10-Q) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) to provide investors with accurate financial information upon which to make informed investment decisions. The securities registrations of issuers that fail to make their required periodic filings are subject to suspension or revocation by the SEC and other enforcement proceedings.
Since it was instituted, the SEC Delinquent Filers Branch has suspended the trading and/or revoked the registration of thousands of companies, often in sweeps of large groups of filers in a single day. Generally, a delinquent filer will receive a letter from the SEC giving the Company 15 days in which to make the filings current, and if such filings were not made current during that time, the SEC would institute administrative proceedings to revoke the registration of the Company’s securities.
Becoming Current
A Company that is delinquent in its reporting requirements has three options to become current in its reporting requirements. Upon filing the delinquent reports, the Company will satisfy the current information requirement for use of Rule 144 and will satisfy the “filed all reports” requirement for use of Form S-8.
Option A: File All Past Due Exchange Act Reports
This option is fairly self-explanatory; however, a few practice notes are helpful. In preparing and writing the past due reports, the drafter should complete all the information to the current date of filing the report. The description of the business and business plans, the names and bios of the officers and directors, and the sale of unregistered securities should be written as of the date of filing—provided, however, that there should be an added section in the MD&A which discusses the financial statements attached to that particular report and addressing that particular period. Where appropriate, historical information should be disclosed. So, for example, if the officers and directors have changed, there should be an explanatory disclosure as to the changes and historical information presented, followed by the current officer and director information as of the date of filing.
Accordingly, when completing all past due filings, the bulk of each document will be exactly the same, with the differences consisting of the financial statements, the MD&A section discussing the financial statements for that particular period, and the front page disclosing the date for which the report applies. Each report must be signed and certified by the current chief executive and accounting officers.
Filing all delinquent reports will not satisfy the requirement that a Company has “timely filed” all periodic reports, but it will satisfy the requirement that the Company has filed all reports required to be filed over the subject period of time.
Option B: Request Permission for and File a Multi-year Comprehensive Form 10-K
A Company desiring to file a multi-year comprehensive Form 10-K must obtain permission from the SEC, which requires a great deal of initial groundwork to demonstrate the ability to file the required report in a timely fashion. In particular, a Company desiring to file a multi-year comprehensive Form 10-K must submit correspondence to the SEC’s Office of Chief Accountant at the Division of Corporation Finance with extensive detailed information regarding the missing reports and how the company intends to complete the multi-year comprehensive Form 10-K, including the exact financial statements to be included, the date the filing will be made, the auditor that has been retained (it is helpful for the auditor to include a statement that he or she has, in fact, been retained and is engaging in the required services), and any other supportive facts demonstrating the Company’s ability to comply with the request. This is just a brief summary of the information that must be submitted when requesting the ability to become current using the multi-year comprehensive Form 10-K.
Of course, competent counsel should be retained to either make the submission on the Company’s behalf or assist in the process. Generally, the SEC responds within 10 days.
As with Option A, the multi-year comprehensive Form 10-K will not satisfy the requirement that a Company has “timely filed” all periodic reports, but it will satisfy the requirement that the Company has filed all reports required to be filed over the subject period of time. Upon filing the multi-year comprehensive Form 10-K, the Company will satisfy the current information requirement for use of Rule 144 and will satisfy the “filed all reports” requirement for use of Form S-8.
Option C: Terminate Exchange Act Registration by Filing a Form 15 Followed by a Form 10 Registration Statement
If a Company qualifies to do so, they may file a Form 15, terminating its Exchange Act registration and thereby relieving it of the Exchange Act reporting requirements. To qualify to file a Form 15, a Company currently must either have fewer than 300 shareholders, or fewer than 500 shareholders if it has assets of less than $10 million.
Title V of The JOBS Act amends Section 12(g) and Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act as to threshold shareholder requirements and registration and deregistration requirements such that the shareholder threshold before requiring registration and subsequent reporting with the SEC has been increased from 500 to either (a) 2,000 or more, or (b) 500 or more unaccredited shareholders. It is expected that the SEC will implement rules to amend Exchange Act Rule 12g-4 to conform with Section 12(g).
A Form 15 does not technically relieve a Company’s obligation to file past due reports (only future reports); however, in practice the SEC does not generally require such filings.
An Issuer that files a Form 15 may thereafter file a new Form 10 registration statement subjecting it to the Exchange Act reporting requirements going forward. As with all Form 10 registration statements, the Form 10 will include two years of audited financial statements.
Option C is especially attractive to a Company that is in excess of two years delinquent in its reporting requirements and cannot reasonably obtain the records necessary to complete its audits for those years beyond the two-year period.
SEC Filings and Attorneys
Complying with the SEC reporting requirements is highly technical. Both the Company and individual signing officers are exposed to liability for the contents of such reports. Accordingly, the assistance of qualified SEC counsel is not only highly recommended, but imperative in this process.
Sorry that you had to register under those conditions.eom
117,407 HDC traded today
14:56:12 0.098 3000
14:53:46 0.079 1000
14:23:38 0.098 3000
13:10:23 0.098 38080
13:10:21 0.0949 13920
13:06:44 0.0949 8300
13:06:44 0.094 10000
13:02:29 0.0766 18900
13:02:29 0.0766 6100
09:47:58 0.0979 5000
09:45:40 0.08938 5107
09:45:27 0.0979 1000
09:42:27 0.0979 2000
09:30:01 0.099 2000
https://www.barchart.com/stocks/quotes/HDVY/opinion
Freaking stingy suckers...you should be able to easily knockout 250k to 300k by days end!
Will someone explain to me why they feel .0751 /.0949 exists without raising the bid closer to the ask? What is this? a que for director to start buying that the system MM's are ready to Rockin roll?....or is everyone decided to take a super long lunch while they wait for their bosses to tell them what to do?
....damn shame they don't ask me, I'll tell them what the heck to do with our share price!
I think good news is coming shortly, seems we are holding share price for no reason BS, damn good reason but our CEO hasn't told us yet!
Barchart weblink
https://www.barchart.com/stocks/quotes/HDVY/opinion
https://www.barchart.com/stocks/quotes/HDVY/cheat-sheet
Important? remember if HDC talks with other players that they feel are using our technologies? Do you recall my other message about that? If you were a corporation POSSIBLY using HDC's technology and it was brought to your attention that little ole HDVY had kicked both Neogenomic's and Intel's a$$ would you not be incline to cough up a deal and or royalties to HDC.
Yes a fine line between is it part or HDC technologies or not..just as the last 8-k said of ours. I won't risk court but rather try and strike a deal with HDC.
We have been starved for so long not much will satisfy us!
We need to look at the share price slowly rising. Yes, of course we are getting beat up being on the pinks but our share price still is moving.
It maybe fact or not that the only reason our CEO doesn't update by means of a share holder letter or perhaps a press lease is because there is nothing but maybe there is? I will check today and try and find further information about what laws regarding pink sheet corporations if any? Maybe they can't say certain they I just don't know?
I figure we have between $2-3 million left and no doubt they are trying to do what they can but with us being here so long it may never be enough no matter what they do however it is fair to say we all are dead tired of this crappy game and raw deals from other CEO's in our past. Mc Govern is different but the wait is just terrible not hearing anything from who is running our company.
George, speech please!
Prior last 10-Q or even 11/21/16 when that was filed there has never been any "D" series shares ever issued in HDC or when we were "Direct Wireless"...we have had A,B and C in which last filing which is no longer accurate 45 million "C" series A/S with 30 million O/S. I bitched because I know a min of 15 million were not issued. I say that because the attorneys are going to want cash pay back from the $6 million not pot luck shares.
66,900 HDC trades today
14:46:27 0.0979 5000
14:43:33 0.095 10000
14:43:32 0.09529 10000
11:54:40 0.098 3100
11:52:06 0.098 5000
11:49:12 0.098 6100
11:47:59 0.098 300
11:41:02 0.08302 400
11:40:37 0.0766 9300
11:40:33 0.0766 15700
09:30:05 0.098 2000
It appears HDC has not made any public claim that any Intel products were designed, used or in use nor licensed by and or for? They just copied words -our patent(s)[recall statements in message thread about stall tactics, that is hard to prove but would produce a driving lawsuit if we had big dollars in our corner]
I disagree that even though we may not have a product in that discussion that if our patent(s) were involved some liability exists when looking at the entire picture and time frame. Maybe that could be the reason of some minimum possibility of royalty where as it could be seen by HDC as an insult so approach a Intel competitor and try to do business with them or perhaps a boat load of tiny royalties from an army of smaller corporations, that can sure add up?. All this just seems like an endless uphill battle with very little for many of us to show for the years we have been around this coupled with the time limits left in our patents. This is one of the reasons this company drives me nuts as George just doesn't ever seems to want to drive this vehicle as we would like to see leading to the constant disbelief that nothing exist here that he is not willing to stand up and address us shareholders.
Come one George Mondays and Fridays are your hump days!
Come on George hey! like you we are not getting any younger.eom
I think George backed away from issuing "D" series as there were plenty of "C" series. Yes the language could be a bit different in the "D" series or even same language just new issue. I saw the wording prior but still believe he decided against any new issue.
I believe now that no buy out is at hand involving Intel. I strongly believe we have some decent deals in the making but to get George up on the stage seems to be a bit tough!!
I know you must know that Alan doesn't play with these pennies..enough of my mouth about that.
I see OTCX showed up recently?
Looks like this week we will be moving upward in share price.
Unreal...earlier CD had 15700 shares bid price of .0766 worth = $1202.62 They turn around up the bid price to .095 X 10000 = $950 and actually save money yet make the bid look super? difference in money savings of $250 unreal.
Unrelated to other message here.........
The public company might be taken private. In this case, a stockholder of the public company is given cash for his stock. He actually doesn't have to sell (unlike comments from previous posters) but there is not really advantage in not selling. Since the company no longer completes all the filing requirements necessary to be listed, it will be delisted. Taking a company private is a good way of saving lots of legal and accounting expense and was particularly popular in the wake of Sarbanes-Oxley a few years back that increased these requirements.
Well maybe our CEO figures it is even worth much less than $10 million I mean he seems ashamed to talk about HDC or maybe just stage fright?
Vladimir Vapnik: Statistical Learning | MIT Artificial Intelligence (AI) Podcast
Next another must, NEW amendments......http://securities-law-blog.com/category/otc-markets-listing-requirements/ not only that note our SEC filing dates.
*Presto...note June 27th 2017 in web link.
*Note March 8th 2017 history trades.
Ok when our stock dropped to .01 and below it is time to consider delisting, The number of shareholders can come into play. The Sabanes-Oxley Act was too expensive for where we were sitting too. So my guess is that Kevin Kowbel felt he could no longer do any good and that NEO was to far away for him to consider staying or perhaps he told McGovern you can take it from here as I carried HDC as far as I can with considering all the variables. Who knows maybe Kevin was grooming McGovern? Anyways if you read and define the Sabanes-Oxley Act you may see why things are as they are. Also worth reading is an interesting link for a good Sunday afternoon read. Of course since we were trained well from the wacky tobacky CEO for years and years we just don't trust HDC anymore and is super hard at this point. Maybe McGovern is just after the cash in of his shares <<<<<< see what I mean, why trust them. First we have no choice but down deep I know him and one other directors past travels and family. It is hard to believe that they are intentionally screwing us too, no I seriously doubt that!
http://securities-law-blog.com/2014/04/01/otcmarkets/
http://www.legalandcompliance.com/securities-law/otc-market-compliance/otc-markets-listing-requirements/otcqx-listing-requirements/
We can not list until we are ready comply with the Sabanes-Oxley Act, both rules and expense.
If HDC bankrupts both Intel and the big Q today Intel has a basic common share par value of .001 x 4,430,000,000 = $4,430,000.00 min liability/worth
Where the big Q has a par value of .0001 x 1,215,657,720 = $121,566.00 min liability/worth
This would be the minimum corporate common share worth.
If Allen likes pot luck instead of Caviar he can buy some of our stock why not. In the mid 90's I wouldn't even think of these pennies. I recall my Microsoft bought somewhere around $50 a share and sold at $102 but I had no real volume. I would buy AMD stock as it was cheaper. Telex which I recall bit the dust and Oh! my "Value Jet" stock. My value Jet cost me big time!. My ET account was in transit either from California to New York or the other way around. Microsoft was always stable and that is how I see Intel stock it is something you can kick back in a chair and wait. These pennies are another story as you know. If HDC wasn't tried to 3 ROTH accounts and it was just my 3 retail accounts I would take the loss. I haven't worked since 2007 when I retired but the 1 last hope to build the roth back up because of taxes has me glued here.
This is just a headache to do for 20 cent it better be .50 upward
http://c.stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=hdvy&p=D&yr=0&mn=3&dy=0&i=p19570641249&a=687178419&r=1568464438764
You know I look at some of our patents that are in the now a have life to them and keep on asking myself what gives? We have inventors doing what they do, patent attorneys and a CEO plus like 6 other directors beside our CEO, what in the world is happening?
We must be on the edge of a explosion or are we just continuing in a bad dream but won't give up?
Unfortunately our CEO or company isn't talking yet and maybe he won't but I see every reason why he should up data the investment world. I'm not talking about deals if any I'm just saying if he hasn't a clue how to do a typical shareholders up date than he has no clue in being or pretending to be a real CEO. Real means active and keeping shareholders up dated.
George, you make this company look like a part time job for kids and that is sad simply because we need you to come out from hiding and talk to us. What in the world HDC's plan going forward? Only plan (A) or what?
Big Beef excellent reading materials.eom
Alan you are absolutely correct, I have been reading our main SVM-RFE patent(s) and see where the language has been modified. I also have wondered where in hell did all these Patented examiners get all their knowledge to basically allow applications to go forward and with reading some of your posts one can easily see they do weed out a certain percentage and as you said it is a toss up and can be challenged in a heartbeat. Even in our SEC filings I recall things like crossing over into other patents unrelated to HDC ownership that might happen, these are typical words in a filing but believe more so true in our case. Yes I gather this isn't going to be a smooth ride and never has this leads me to our CEO. We need to somehow hear something to possibly clear up the tangled SVM-RFE technology and feel he won't talk either because he hasn't anything or because he does have something but timing isn't upon us.
I feel strongly that the company needs to produce some kind of shareholder letter/update for better understanding in general!
I must say I just somehow hope we are successful in raising this share price up where I need it!.
Anything is possible but first if you were a company and did NOT have a patent covering whatever you are doing don't you think your attorneys would check your product, design or what ever and then tell you that you are crossing into someone patent? specially since the USPTO was involved prior and that HDC has patents and that tiny company won a arbitration suite and kicked Intel's a$$ in the same month. I think I would at least listen to what HDC has to say as well as HDC listening to them but all in all lets get along together and move forward, remember a little bit of sugar can go a long ways and all parties know this.
So Intel may challenge us because why? So we are using their patent? What SVM-RFE patent of their? HDC isn't going to try and stand on a park bench and try to clobber Intel as they walk by? Nope! will slap someone into helping us kick a$$ and with enough help we will stand and no longer be seen crawling next to the park bench or begging again.
Look HDC has been through a lot of crap like us so they are wise to the other corporate BS, also worth remembering it isn't day traders keeping this stock where it is. By now we should have been back to .006 something good may come by Christmas only if we are good!
Lighten up we are ok, ok is better than not ok right?