Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Encouraging! Thanks for your input.
Thanks Hotrod. Voice of reason. Keep posting.
I pretty comfortable here. BEIJING BILL is on board and he usually brings good luck! What's not to like.
The only potential sellers are IHUB posters here and Mr. Snaper. Float practically locked. I don't expect anyone to sell now. Lots to potentially lose and little to gain.
Only works if the company directors want to communicate. Clearly not the case here. I believe that LT and Prentice actually went head to head on this issue. Probably hastened LT's departure. Despite his quirks, LT did seem our advocate.
Strange developments today which is par for the course where CTDT is concerned. It is interesting that this "gag order" was levied at virtually the same time that IHUB discussion became focused on "product" speculation. Specifically, Aroque articulated an astute possible product scenario which many of us found intriguing. I wonder if Mr. Prentice reviews IHUB posts and..... had possibly seen enough!
I don't think you'll regret it. Again, this doesn't fit the typical "pinky scam" profile IMO. It's worth waiting out as has been my view for a while.
Great post. Refreshingly pragmatic.
Hope this is our week!
This is the point where Jay usually chimes in with "I'd settle for $.50 first". (LOL) But I'm with you on this!
Your concern re: commmon share cancellation is valid but to what degree? In order for the C-ship to cancel, there would need to be clear benefit to government, housing, the economy, and federal tax revenue. So....where are the positives to cancellation in your view? We all know they can do it. I myself see more positives to sustaining FNMA, at least as is. Remember, there are many great arguments also justifying FNMA's return to the private sector which could be viewed as an epic victory for both government and shareholders alike. I feel this to be more likely and thus lucrative to fortunate shareholders.
And more likely if the buying continues, we may see $10. Seems like I stand to make much more as a bull than with your approach. As always, thanks for your advice.
Thanks for your insight and concern. So....are you buying like I will be at the market open?
He has always answered my calls on Saturday, even at times when the questioning may be poignant. I'll say this....he's got balls, has work-ethic, and is honest and forthright. He is as helpful as he possibly can be. I simply believe he is not privy to the most sensitive details of the inner workings. Unfortunately, I'm not sure if he recognizes this.
Pedro...I think many of your concerns are figured into the SP already. That's why the stock is $2 and not $70. Your concern re: commmon share cancellation is valid but to what degree? In order for the C-ship to cancel, there would need to be clear benefit to government, housing, the economy, and federal tax revenue. So....where are the positives to cancellation in your view? We all know they can do it. I myself see more positives to sustaining FNMA, at least as is. Remember, there are many great arguments also justifying FNMA's return to the private sector which could be viewed as an epic victory for both government and shareholders alike.
C'mon Jay. We've got the... Blog! LOL.
I think so. Certainly overdue. Interesting how posters show up out of the blue and attach generalized "OTC" behavior to a stock (CTDT) they are unfamiliar with. What is typical about this stock? Nothing! Tiny float. No debt. No pumping, fluff type PR's. Reputable CEO with a world class resume. 400% up since April and no true selling. If I knew nothing else about CTDT, I would still have interest.
I think the date is 6/6/13. Most of those shares, I believe, belong to Al Snaper. It would be unlikely for him to sell and thus lose controlling interest.
Earlier today, I spoke with LT who said that he expected some 90 pages of paperwork for review from Mr. Prentice. I just spoke with him again and he is now unable to comment on company matters. He promised both blog and actual PR action as quickly as possible. Although we have heard this before, I am optimistic for real news this week. Seems the timing is right given the company's 1 year anniversary, lifting of share restriction, and the seemingly endless number of recent "meetings"
Not your typical OTC stock,IMO.
Probably worth sticking around for another month or so to see if it pans out.
Good one!
Had a feeling you were also aware of this, Hotrod. LT's Blog focused on these points deliberately albeit somewhat cryptically. Thanks for your input. I hope you keep posting.
I suspect you're spot on. Nice assessment!
Jacuzzy? Never mind....doesn't matter.
Jay or rather..... "President Jay"
You often bring up meaningful and valid points but at times you can go "over-the-top". LT certainly may be employed by the company without PR notification. By your criterion, Centaurus employs 2 people currently. Public company officers must be disclosed but LT probably sits at a significantly lower company ladder rung. I, for one, take LT at his word that he is now employed by CTDT. The company (which links his blog to their website) is ultimately responsible for what he reports.
Having said this, I certainly agree with you that a meaningful, formal PR release is overdue and of infinitely greater value than blog posts. I think these blog entries are simply LT's way of reminding core shareholders that things are positively evolving.
Actually Jay, LT himself referred to the blog as an official mouthpiece of the company. He made that statement after formally accepting a position with Centaurus.
Spoke with LT. Meetings remain ongoing hence no announcement as yet. Stay tuned.
I suspect you're dead on. Can't argue with any of your facts or "gut feelings".
Yahoo quotes 55 JBII employees on the company profile tab; E-trade quotes 56 employees. Either one could be out of date accounting for this discrepancy. IMO, not the employee staffing numbers typically associated with pink sheet scams, as some would have us believe.
Welcome back jacuzyy! Although I'm never quite sure what you're trying to say, you consistently entertain.
I'm reluctant to take those who resist speaking in the 1st person at their word.
Or he's full of it! Didn't seem all that savvy with regard to CTDT, IMO.
Ya know, Jay....up 700% in the past month isn't bad. It's also consolidating pretty nicely.
Sooner than many would think. Last week's PR is what I consider a "foundation" type PR which establishes a baseline from which subsequent PR's will expand. Q was right when he pointed out that some were looking to sell into the first PR and were disappointed by its relatively uninspiring (albeit factual) content. Some of these guys are now gone. As a lot of us here already know, CTDT is not an APS Promo but a legitimate developing entity with an almost limitless horizon. We are not going to $1-2 overnight but I think we will get there. FWIW, I also bought shares every day last week. I also expect a very substantive, more eye-popping PR by the end of next week, probably Wednesday or Thursday. We really haven't got started yet but make no mistake, CTDT is the real deal!
Legitimate company in which the SP will certainly go up over time. Just won't be a one month wonder stock which are typically shell companies being heavily promoted. I'm not worried in the least.
Got some shares on the cheap as well. I'm OK with that.
One PR in 4 months and you label this a "Promo Stock"? I think that's taking poetic license to a new level!
Longhorn,
You're a little behind the curve. That write up was from nearly a year ago. They actually do make diamonds and have a patent for their manufacturing process. You should try to keep up! I know you mean well. GLTU.
This is really a high credibility PR which may not excite typical penny traders. This is, again, a foundation upon which subsequent company info/fundamentals will be based. It's not your typical fluff PR with letters of intent and unrealistic projections (read APS promos). I'm very happy with this release and expect more to come. Nice job LT!