Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
But I will, and it took me literally 2 minutes to find them, probably more time that you actually looked at the website with your low effort fud.
https://www.yelp.com/not_recommended_reviews/aria-addiction-recovery-institute-of-america-west-palm-beach-2
Just open this link, it's due to that website being weird in how they factor in reviews into their overall score, which means that we now have
2 recommended reviews, 1 good, 1 bad
2 non recommended reviews, both good
2 deleted reviews
Which means 6 reviews in total, only 1 you can certainly assert is negative, one was posted by ARIA itself, and violated the site's ToS most likely because they don't allow businesses to review themselves (pretty sound thinking tbh), the other probably violated some other point of their ToS.
So of those 2 deletions, you can only argue one could have been some blockbuster scandal that would have destroyed GRST's stock price further.
If you chose to believe that (sorry to announce I can't find proof on an unknown variable), then we're back to getting the numbers right
3 good, 1 good recommended, 2 good non recommended
2 bad? 1 bad recommended, 1 (bad?) deleted
So now that I look at it again, we total at not even 50/50 good/bad
TLDR
If you're gonna start saying that reviews are untrustworthy and can be both obfuscated and paid for, but also call for people to not buy GRST because of 1 available bad review, your boat just doesn't hold water.
Talking about the reviews is stupid anyway, look at the financials, at least those are generally more trustworthy as lying on them can cause actual legal issues to whoever is lying
Of course you don't mention the exact opposite review of someone truly satisfied of their stay.
I'm sorry but only 2 reviews diametrically opposed in experience allows us to determine more or less nothing about how the facility is performing.
Correction, your fud is completely baseless, there's 4 reviews currently shown and 3 out of 4 are shining, but lets focus on the one negative, because that's what we like to do when the pps is low right?
What's happening? News or are we just bouncing?
Yeah of course man, just like you're absolutely omniscient about what lenders do or do not, you're absolutely omniscient about what traders and the market thinks.
If you're so ungodly good at feeling the pulse of a market, why don't you just short this stock? I mean margin requirements are a bother and there's insane risk, but if you know for sure this is going to trips you might as well no? Why give up free money?
We're not grasping at straws that the reason there's no new deal is because current lenders refuse to loan more?
You amaze me with your restraint.
Well said, when/if debt matters are cleared up, you can be sure that this won't trade under a penny, it's elementary investing to identify why things are down, it's usually for a good reason and it's better to believe in the market being efficient, as such, a GRST with no debt would be a GRST trading at the bare minimum 10 times higher.
Now the play here is to also identify that the latest figures do give some hope, and Bubae once again shifted his goalposts from "too many losses" to now "not enough profit", I maintain my assessment that he will still call this a retail milking machine if this becomes an healthcare empire of 4-5 treatment centers in half a decade and starts pulling as much profit quarterly as its pulling revenue now.
Now of course I won't be in this for 5 years, but it'll be hilarious if his long awaited 30th of November arrives and no dump occurs from Labry's notes.
He constantly builds assumptions upon assumptions upon assumptions from the breadcrumbs he finds in filings, while he has absolutely no ability to know what ownership percentage of ARIA GRST has apart from the 75% figure and the legal language of the options that lenders COULD exercise, just like he has no ability to know if Labrys will prefer to steadily spend their notes to not murder a potential golden goose.
But still, he chooses to ignore near certainties, and that is the fact we're getting a bit under a million of revenue of profit each quarter (I can read filings too), and this, as has been outlined in both PR and ER, is only set to improve quarter over quarter.
Why the hell wouldn't you invest in something basically guaranteed currently to post a profit?
How many stocks on the OTC this close to trips can you point me to that posted such a large revenue figure this quarter?
How many stocks on the OTC can you point me to that are more or less worth their annual revenue?
All these factors make me certain GRST is the place to be, and if I have to average down into the trips for my outsized returns, I will.
Sure does, you'd wish the bloody share price would reflect it lol
Love how he twists the words exactly the way he wants to mean the opposite of what it means, according to him we're supposed to be both afraid of debt and afraid of solutions that limit debt and dilution.
I'll keep adding gently, we're getting past my ideal window of investment but this is too big to ignore
We are now back below the valuation this company had as basically only vague promises of some acquisition and a letterbox, with 900k hitting the bank in the last 3 months, this is absolutely insane
Volume so far is good news, there's absolutely no walk down despite 30m being traded so far, to me that just indicates 15 is stable, maybe a bit too stable, is it too much to ask for people to slap the ask?
Decent volume when we're only 50 minutes into the trading session, price action is a bit disappointing but oh well
If you mean pandemic relief loans, there's an entire section in the report about them
We didn't trade yet since the news dropped, it was AH and market isn't open yet
Oh I'm sorry I didn't remember the one post where you talked about it instead of the other 20 where you said revenue growth will be disappointing to traders (tsk that one isn't really on point anymore is it?).
I'm really awfully sorry I don't exactly keep your endless flow of crap in a diary.
Still, you're about to be proven thoroughly wrong for the next month of trading at the very least, and who knows where we'll be going from there.
Honestly, its gonna be very good for me to be making money, but it's also gonna be very good for the ego to be proven thoroughly right.
Anyone planning on putting in a bit more after the news dropped and they're a bit more certain of not buying a falling knife?
:D Unreal, mark this post when GRST is above 0.0050 or even one penny and Bubae still bashes it, it's literally impossible to assert if there's a brain underneath that thick skull
Bla bla bla your goalposts are shifting, first revenue didn't matter, now it's earnings we should be looking at?
What next, we should only buy in this once it has zero debt and retires 99% of its shares?
Fact is, there's a reason this is so low, if those reasons weren't there, we just wouldn't be trading at 0.0014$.
Knowing what we know, and discounting any future growth from being accounted for, this stock has at the very least a 3-4 bagger in it from last close.
Just let it go man, we're never coming back to trips.
But I'll indulge you, if there was 0 liabilities, and that OS remained at more or less 4 billion, how would you price this stock? Would you agree it would be much higher than 0.0015? Do you think that wouldn't have been priced in and that level wouldn't have been held religiously?
I swear you'll be bashing this stock all the way to the penny this quarter and refuse to take an opportunity of making money, very sensible and emotionless approach from the wise investor you are Bubs.
Anyway, for the initial surge, my money is on 0.0025 at close today
Probably a bit overenthusiastic, but I wouldn't see a mcap over 25m by next year as completely unjustified
You can... I'm literally reading it right now
Assuming next quarter is as good, it looks like our CEO wasn't lying about that 1.8m over Q3 and Q4.
Now remains to be seen how the market receives this, but we'd be in a very mad world if we didn't have a great day tomorrow
Fingers crossed, I mean I could wait a week more but I'd prefer if we avoided OTC delinquency
No report dropping? Damn I expected a bit more from Shawn
And he shifts the goalposts again, I can't bother debating him anymore, let history be my witness
"Revenue potential is known"
Then go on oh wise one, tell us the exact revenue, no no, not just copypasting the FAQ answer, tell us exactly what quarterly revenue we're gonna get, 400k? 600k? 800k?
Since it's "known", why does no one here, including you, give us a certain figure on what we'll get?
Or are you gonna argue that there will be no difference if it's 200k compared to 900k?
"Last PR"
Last PR was a complete dud that had no immediate affect on the company's position, and therefore no lasting affect on the stock.
Seriously comparing a run up due to some vague future value from a real estate change in the center's area to you know, the company actually making money, is so bloody disingenuous, but I'm not gonna say I expect more from you.
Also the PR about the licenses is the exact same thing, an event that changes nothing about the company's potential valuation.
The only case where the licenses could have had lasting influence on market sentiment and stock price is if they DIDNT get renewed, which would have more or less killed this company and stock.
Also why do you keep saying this is a very old story? several hundred of thousands reported on a single quarter when this stock had barely any revenue prior will be a brand new story.
Every single conjecture you make out of the filings turns out wrong no matter how you look at it
According the extension it is, Shawn was on time in August, but with how disappointing he's been this quarter...
"Why would traders buy after earnings"
As important as
"Why did traders buy before earnings"
And has an easy answer, because it was low and they expect it to be high.
Give me a single example of a stock (OTC or not) that has not had a significant run with a multiplication of its quarterly revenue, especially an example of one that had a +50% pullback from its previous earnings.
Good news mean momentum, momentum usually continues until price action becomes unsustainable.
Where does price action become unsustainable? That's an eternal issue and no one buys the exact bottom or top, but from here we could go to 0.0075 within next quarter without meeting significant issues, and I'd call the stock severely overvalued anywhere above a penny.
People bought back when it was 0.0050, 0.0040, 0.0030, 0.0020 expecting to flip it quickly, why wouldn't others decide to buy the uptrend to flip it quickly at 0.0020, 0.0030, 0.0040 and 0.0050?
You're not even attempting to debate this logically anymore and just assume you're omniscient on the market's psychology
What's your average? I've been open about mine being 15 (happy being in the money today between :D), But I like seeing where the other regulars are standing.
Nice, already added all I wanted to add last week, but good luck
Enough excitement yet for you? Or do we need to get a 200m shares traded day BEFORE the news hit for there to be enough bullish sentiment lmao?
Dude, pretty uncool of you to just openly lie, also 1.7m on a single quarter would be uh, very good but slightly out of bounds of what could be expected .
Link? If it's true Bubae is eternally destroyed
Seems like we're not getting a PM filings drop, maybe an AH one? Or we could go delinquent on the deadlines...
Eh, crash already happened, sad for those that were waiting out for trips, we're waving goodbye to them for at the very least a year from now if ER is good.
Now I'll stop running in circles speculating about an event that no one has any clue if good or bad and hibernate a bit until we actually get either our reckoning or our ascension into the light
I mean you'd have to adjust for inflation, and if it's a deprecating value asset then obviously it'll have lost value during 6-7 years.
Or it could just be patent rights valued 2.5 million, in which case only inflation would hurt it.
I still don't get how you can shape up an unknown asset as being a liability?
If you're gonna criticize something criticize dilutive debt or whatever, I've never seen anybody criticize something as bizarre as a listed asset on a balance sheet
From that comment I guess you're saying explode downwards? I mean in term of sentiment it makes perfect sense, Bubae for once will be right that if we don't get good news from this report any traders and even those who consider this an investment will bail out, which means barely anyone will sustain price action anymore. I don't think this will happen given what we know but this stock has surprised many this year so who knows
If we don't get any results from ARIA when earnings drop then Shawn starts becoming genuinely fraudulent and from there price action will get ugly, but I doubt it will, and numbers would have to be truly horrifically low (underneath 500k over two quarters kind of low) for it to NOT be at least a short term catalyst for some sort of reversal.
If price action answers such an increase in revenue by going down after such a downturn, we would be truly in the weirdest stock on the OTC.
But like I said I'll be in profit the moment we cross 0.0015, so I'm not in the least worried about my investment if we get good numbers.
One may argue that I could have avoided all this by selling in the nonsense pump of September which could have gotten me a 70% profit at peak and just waited until last week to load back in but oh well, foresight is 20/20.
So far I have 16.5 million shares, and I'm not planning on even starting to think about selling before 0.0050
With very good results I see this going to 0.0030 by Friday next week, with good momentum bringing us north of 0.0050-0.0060 by Christmas at the latest, most important point there is are the results of this report very good?
Yes but like, what's your point?
Has this happened yet?
I'm not seeing a billion new shares hitting the stock every month, complaining about some dilution in the OTC is like Wake said, complaining about water in the sea.
Point is, dilution has indeed had a slowdown over last quarter and at this pace we would have to wait months before this dilution pace starts seriously eroding our positions.
Shawn has been silent but this is one of the statements he made that appears to have been truthful.
Also aren't you the one telling us constantly that authorized shares are 10 billion?
Point is, come next week, the earnings will most likely make this stock blow upwards and people will hate themselves for not loading prior.
My average is 0.0015 and I am not in the least worried about my money.