Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Curious how this ends. Status quo for now.
Hopefully for longs, you're right. We'll see.
I take facts and silly monikers very seriously.
Understood. They probably transposed it with the rule about 30 consecutive business days with a closing PPS under $1, which leads to a delinquency notice. Common mistake.
It's ten consecutive business days at $1+. Not sure why 30 days was mentioned, or why that would discourage shorts from shorting.
The company can't forcefully make the PPS 1$+. The market as a whole determines that. Therefore, the R/S could still happen but hopefully it won't be too aggressive.
Definitely a stretch, that's for sure.
Right, like MOST companies nowadays. And?
OK, back on topic... $WDLF in trips tomorrow?
Right, says the politicians in power. Sheep follow.
Not funny.
Alas, I do. No, I'm not in love with $RSHN.
So, Dow Jones and S&P500? That's it? Haha.
Did you mean, "we'll never see $0.70 again"?
"The market is ripping." REALLY? Please explain.
What you said applies to MANY companies. FYI.
Sounds bullish! What's your average?
PPS could be anything, moving forward. Hopefully higher.
Valid points. Can't deny the truth in your statements. Too many CEOs lately are making promises and not keeping them. It's better to not vow than it is to vow and not fulfill it.
Tech Business Incubator experiencing tech issues. Nice. From the same mismanagement team that blocked longs from the shareholder network for asking reasonable questions, now this. Apparently, I picked the wrong stock to go long on. Oh well... I might still load up if it hits no-bid/$0.0001.
Further, large posts imply desperation. Today's news: BULLISH! However, caveat emptor. Now the company has to actually follow through with future projections, AND manage any potential revenue responsibly. Also, the implications of a potential reverse/split needs to be addressed in the coming month(s). Fetter expectations, as always. GLTY!
Maybe. Time will tell. Can't sell regardless, so I'm stuck waiting for a definitive outcome.
Tantrum conveniently omits today's bullish news, LMFAO! Here, let me help with that: Link to conveniently omitted news regarding current assembly of 350+ vehicles and future assembly of 300 vehicles later in 2023. ;)
My average is way higher, so just watching.
True. Won't get any arguments from me there.
Thank goodness! That interview with LH and Cal from FJ did provide some comic relief, however. Ultimately, LH became a meme that pumped the stock slightly, but longs don't need nonsensical pumps and temporary price hikes; what's needed is much less dilution and far more sales and distribution of legitimate products. #Mullenz #LawrenceForPresident
Not reassuring. However, David recently commented on Twitter, "Just reinstated with Colorado. That was step one. Next is reapply to OTC. Then update financials. Aim is to be current by the end of summer."
So, who knows? Could be true... time will tell.
Absolutely right. That's the one. Thank you.
Read what I wrote. I'm bullish and long.
Yes, a R/S can be approved/initiated twice, rapidly. Not common, but it can happen. A different ticker had one occur on 1/13/23 and again on 6/1/23; that's less than six months apart. Just saying, is all.
For the record, I'm bullish for $MULN based on technicals because the selling pressure has been far too aggressive to be sustainable, so shorts will have to cover eventually. That being said, I am becoming increasingly skeptical of the company due to recent happenings. The shorts here are making valid points. For example, why announce a buy-back and then include a clause to potentially back out of doing it later? That nonsense regarding Lawrence seemed like a pump, and of course Cal is long so that's why he pumps as well. Speaking of Financial Journey, Cal initially indicated that a recent interview with the CEO was about an hour long but $MULN's team sliced and diced it down to just a mere few minutes. Why? Kind of sus, IMO, to leave out so much information. Finally, the CEO looks like an overweight gangster and talks like an arrogant swindler, so that's not helping matters, and the lack of financials needs to be addressed as well. Not that a CEO needs to look great in a bathing suit, but a lack of discipline in the kitchen usually means a lack of discipline in other areas of life as well, such as business.
Regardless, as previously stated, I'm still bullish but just skeptical because this ain't my first or last rodeo. $MULN passes based on technicals but fails based on financials (or a lack thereof). Feel free, anyone (regardless of sentiment), to argue for or against any of my points... I'm all ears and try to see all sides. As always, caveat emptor.
A $0.000X bid is not worthy of celebration!!! Simulated fanfare can't whitewash the consequences of the mismanagement team's most recent actions. For example, blocking longs from the shareholder network for questioning the rationale of performing a reverse split. Blocking longs was not only impractical but potentially illegal since withholding material information from targeted investors is at best unethical. The PPS being stuck in the trips presently may reflect diminished trust between shareholders and management. Not exactly something to celebrate!
Eh... might get beaten back down to ~$3.
Financials for $KERN seem a bit rough lately.
Were investors $HOODwinked during the IPO?
One doge equals one doge.
What's going on with this stank, sweaty $BOTY?
A couple billion might be a bit ambitious.
Financials seem pretty good, yes? Net positive, supposedly.
Anyone having $PHUN yet? Been a rough year.
Financials seem a bit rough for this company.
It belongs much higher, that's for sure.
Back down to ~$0.90, it seems.