Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
agreed, but I think there are enough people around who harbor dreams that it just might be real...
er, except maybe "down".
6 trades today. 15k shares, at avg px of .18
grand total of $2,700 in trades. not going to change much without a reason. what reason would there be?
It beats doing my paperwork at work.
Absolutely. Took place in the Nevada desert.
0-fer-2:
Posted by: mavericktrader
In reply to: abbytraderwin who wrote msg# 138483 Date:12/2/2006 12:24:57 PM
Post #of 139357
Yeah the bashers are going to be hurting when Johntut unloads some PR on them.Gotta love those big block buys that will be coming!..the cobra will strike swiftly.....Have a great weekend abby .I will be watching my San Diego Chargers give the Bills a hurting!
Here's a few:
General Dynamics
Starbucks
Bombardier
Home Depot
They will get my shares when they pry my cold, dead fingers off of them!!!
Seems as if the JV and Subs page at cvsu.us is blank. Does everyone get the same result?
Mood: Blessed?
I'm thinking they feel less blessed.
Nope.
Not me.
He's the only entertaiment left here. Especially with all the OTs being deleted.
I've become convinced that no one who actually dresses themselves is that obtuse. Consequently, I am convinced that les (or shawn) is intentionally messin' with y'all
25k trade at .21 that was posted at 15:28:36 was cxld at 16:05:31
Interesting. DWP was the rat. I'm sure he'll remain 100% on topic.
Interesting, the I-box.
Looks like all of RPH's illegal spewings have been deleted.
Posted by: CstaRcaBound
In reply to: None Date:10/27/2006 5:45:43 PM
Post #of 139113
Here's a little primer on internet libel Laws, figured this is relevent info for quite a few members on this thread.
Melvin v. Doe
¶document.write(paraNum);paraNum += 1;12 In November 2000, the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, PA, held that if the plaintiff could prove the identity of defendant was "(1) material, relevant, and necessary, (2) cannot be obtained by alternative means, and (3) is crucial to plaintiff's case," the First Amendment would not protect the anonymity of the defendant.14 In Melvin v. Doe, an unknown person published statements on a website that accused a local judge of political activity that was inappropriate for a judge in her position.15 The plaintiff sued the unknown speaker for defamation and tried to obtain his identity during discovery.16 The defendant petitioned the court for a protective order that would prevent this discovery.17 However, the order was denied.18 The court reasoned that a state's interest in discouraging defamatory statements about public officials by traditional media extended to statements made on the Internet. It held that because of this interest, there was no absolute immunity for Internet speakers with regard to the defamation tort.19 The court then applied the three-part test discussed above to the request for the speaker's identity.20 Without much discussion about the test's application to the specific facts of the case, the court held that the plaintiff's interest outweighed the defendant's, and the protective order should be denied.21
A. The elements that must be proved to establish defamation are:
1 a publication to one other than the person defamed;
2 a false statement of fact;
3 that is understood as
a. being of and concerning the plaintiff; and
b. tending to harm the reputation of plaintiff.
If the plaintiff is a public figure, he or she must also prove actual malice.
B. A few courts have said that statements made in the context of an Internet bulletin board or chat room are highly likely to be opinions or hyperbole, but they do look at the remark in context to see if it's likely to be seen as a true, even if controversial, opinion ("I really hate George Lucas' new movie")( not libel) rather than an assertion of fact dressed up as an opinion ("It's my opinion that Trinity is the hacker who broke into the IRS database").(libel) (comparable to “It’s my opinion that Rufus Paul Harris is a fraud”.)
C. The following are a couple of examples from California cases; note the law may vary from state to state. Libelous (when false):
Charging someone with being a communist (in 1959)
Calling an attorney a "crook" (comparable to calling a CEO a “fraud”)
Describing a woman as a call girl
Accusing a minister of unethical conduct
Accusing a father of violating the confidence of son
D. When libel is clear on its face, without the need for any explanatory matter, it is called libel per se. The following are often found to be libelous per se:
A statement that falsely:
Charges any person with crime, or with having been indicted, convicted, or punished for crime;
Imputes in him the present existence of an infectious, contagious, or loathsome disease;
Tends directly to injure him in respect to his office, profession, trade or business, either by imputing to him general disqualification in those respects that the office or other occupation peculiarly requires, or by imputing something with reference to his office, profession, trade, or business that has a natural tendency to lessen its profits;
Imputes to him impotence or a want of chastity.
A&B&C&D
http://www.eff.org/bloggers/lg/faq-defamation.php
This info is posted to inform some of you that legal recourse is quite possible, and has been stated by RPH to be a very real possiblity in the near future for those engaged in such conduct against CSHD. Hardball can be avery costly game, the 1st Amendment can only protect you until you cross the line. The line has been crossed by many,(who have been noted). Know what you could be getting yourself and your families into.
Pissed? no. I think it's great that it's at .30---more bagholders can get out. I wouldn't be shocked to see some 40 or 50 cent prints.
I am, however, saddened that the booard is getting boring and there doesn't seem to be any room for OT posts.
NO one owns the phrase "lotus-eaters".
That should be "hauled into court", as per Rufie's Mensah filing.
Anybody been to cvsu.us lately?
CLick on "JVs and Subs" and tell me what you see? I'm wondering if it is my work computer, or if NOTHING is there...
Dogspeed
____________
Put your faith in Dog, not in money or people.
hey serf, did you notice all of the pumpers last week hinting about big things coming this week? do you think they had inside info courtesy of the "shareholders' committee"?
Funny you should say that...the A55holes here all seem to be the pumpers...like lesnshawn. Others are right nice folks.
btw, i forgot to wish you happy birthday on Tuesday. Why the sudden registration (free)and exlusive CSHD pumping, er I mean posting?
hmmmm, what else happened on Tuesday?
hey serf, did you notice all of the pumpers last week hinting about big things coming this week? do you think they had inside info courtesy of the "shareholders' committee"?
Indeed. Like I said earlier this week, we'd see .30 before .05. I think we'll see .50 before .05
However, I think we'll see .05 WAY before we see 5.00.
All just my very humble opinion, of course.
i don't think he is....what I'm seeing is people eating a whole knew bunch of lotuses now that Tut is CEO. they'll bid this beeyatch up for a while. IMO, of course.
traded 2k at .33 at 11:52:44
Only you can, by saying "don't feed the beast". but if the beast are the CD holders, it's a losing battle. IMO, of course
Good article explaining death spirals here: http://www.stockpatrol.com/article/key/deathspiral
There is a reason that toxic financing deals are called "toxic".
It's also called "death spiral financing".
what a freakin' knucklehead.
nothing is real...all is illusion. Lester is either obtuse or intentionally misleading.
any bets?
Patrick Byrne.
However, CSHD is in the dock. Bad for you.
As long as that is the case, you'll get no 211s filed by MMs.
Not me, love.
I'm in EFA, BYD and O. I'm an Investore
Take a deep breath, mister. You're going to have a stroke.
after a couple of up days, mixed with the John Arlitt news, the coolaid drinkers are accessing more capital. I think we'll see 40-50, then a dump. IMO, of course
Very odd tht it would disappear.
Is I-Hub going to revert to pumper heaven, Mods? I know Blue Sky Basin was here this a.m.
absolutely.
In fact, I predicted this. i still think we'll see .40 or .50 tomorrow.
cshd climbs 25%+ every day
You should really follow the stock, amigo. Prior to Friday it was down every day for a month.
General, are you sure that quote is from Robin Williams?
It was posted on the bulletin board in my dorm at uconn in 1977 or so....when it was much more au courant
LMAO.
As long as it isn't Chris Berman...
I wouldn't be surprised to see this hit .50 or .60...
If you have rat testes, it may be worth a shot...
Arlitt is now listed at CVSU.US
They have his bio but fail to mention prior pump and dumps or his sanction in BC.