Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Those were quotes from other Americans who posted on a web forum. Just relaying that millions of citizens want to know the truth. Looks like the BC is not going away, and is reaching critical mass. Even democrats are starting to question the eligibility now....
Is this the case that will break the presidential eligibility question wide open?
The Supreme Court conferred on whether arguments should be heard on the merits of Kerchner v. Obama, a case challenging whether President Barack Obama is qualified to serve as president because he may not be a "natural-born citizen" as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.
Unlike other eligibility cases that have reached the Supreme Court, Kerchner vs. Obama focuses on the "Vattel theory," which argues that the writers of the Constitution believed the term "natural-born citizen" to mean a person born in the United States to parents who were both American citizens.
"This case is unprecedented," said Mario Apuzzo, the attorney bringing the suit. "I believe we presented an ironclad case. We've shown standing, and we've shown the importance of the issue for the Supreme Court. There's nothing standing in their way to grant us a writ of certiorari."
If the Supreme Court decides to grant the "writ of certiorari," it may direct a federal trial court in New Jersey to hear the merits of the case, or it may choose to hear the merits itself. The court's decision on the writ could be announced as early as Wednesday.
If any court hears the merits of the case, Apuzzo says it will mark the "death knell" for Obama's legitimacy.
"Given my research of what a natural-born citizen is, he cannot be a natural-born citizen so it's a death knell to his legitimacy. What happens on a practical level, how our political institutions would work that out, is something else," Apuzzo told WND.
Mario Apuzzo
Apuzzo observed it is "undisputed fact" that Obama's father was a British subject.
A hearing on the merits "is also a death knell because it would allow discovery so we would be able to ask him for his birth certificate, and we don't know what that would show," according to Apuzzo. "We might not even get to the question of defining 'natural-born citizen.' If he was not born in the U.S., he'd be undocumented, because he's never been naturalized. We don't even know what his citizenship status is. Hawaii has said they have his records, but that's hearsay. We have not seen the root documents."
Another attorney who has brought Obama eligibility cases to the Supreme Court, Philip Berg, agrees that discovery would sink Obama's presidency.
"If one court had guts enough to deal with this and allow discovery, Obama would be out of office," Berg told WND. "We would ask for a lift of Obama's ban on all of his documents. The last official report said Obama has spent $1.6 million in legal fees [keeping his papers secret], and the total is probably over $2 million now. You don't spend that kind of money unless there's something to hide, and I believe the reason he's hiding this is because he was not born in the United States."
"The Supreme Court has never decided to hear the merits of an eligibility case," Berg added. "If the Supreme Court would decide to hear a case, Obama would be out of office instantly. If Congress decided to hear a case, Obama would be out of office."
"They're taking a different approach, arguing that both parents must be citizens," Berg noted.
Apuzzo is arguing the "Vattel theory," which asserts that the term "natural-born citizen" as used in the Constitution was defined by French writer Emer de Vattel. Vattel, whose work, "The Law of Nations," was widely known and respected by the founding fathers, used the term to mean an individual born of two citizens.
According to Apuzzo, Congress and the courts have addressed the question of who can be an American citizen, for example regarding former slaves, Asian immigrants, and American Indians. However, the term "natural-born citizen" has never been altered.
"The courts and Congress have never changed the definition," said Apuzzo. "The founding fathers understood that the commander-in-chief of the armed forces needed to have two American citizens as parents so that American values would be imparted to him."
Apuzzo said the Supreme Court had clearly accepted Vattel's definition of "natural-born citizen" in "dicta," or statements made in opinions on cases addressing other matters. He cited Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall's opinion in the 1814 "Venus" case, in which Marshall endorses Vattel's definition.
Apuzzo also cites the writings of founding father David Ramsay, an influential South Carolina physician and historian who used similar language to Vattel.
Previous cases challenging Obama's eligibility have all been rejected on technical grounds. Numerous courts have decided that the plaintiffs do not have "standing" to bring a suit against Obama because they have failed to prove they are directly injured by his occupation of the Oval Office.
"To me that's false," said Berg. "The 10th Amendment refers to 'we the people.' If the people can't challenge the president's constitutionality, that would be ridiculous."
"My clients have a right to protection from an illegitimately sitting president," said Apuzzo. "Every decision he makes affects the life, property, and welfare of my clients."
Apuzzo said the founding fathers had good reason to require the president to be a natural-born citizen.
"They were making sure the President had the values from being reared from a child in the American system, and thereby would preserve everybody's life, liberty and property in the process.
"They made that decision, so my clients have every right to expect the president to be a natural-born citizen. It goes to all your basic rights, every right that is inalienable. The president has to be a natural-born citizen."
Abercrombie told Evans during a telephone conversation that he searched everywhere for the birth certificate. He told him that he went to the only two hospitals that existed in Honolulu at the time at which a baby could be born, Kapi’olani Women’s and Children’s Hospital and Queen’s Hospital. Abercrombie told him that there is no Obama birth certificate in Hawaii and that there is absolutely no proof that Obama was born in Hawaii. Abercrombie also told Evans that he remembered Obama playing in a tee-ball league when he was about 5 or 6 but not before that. A confirmation of this information can be heard on a recording of an interview on the radio 92 KQRS Morning Show done on January 20, 2011. During this radio show, Mike Evans, recounts the details of his conversation he had with Governor Abercrombie just the day before.
A story on this new revelation and the radio interview can be heard at
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/01/hawaii-hollywood-reporter-mike-evans.html . A full bio on Mike Evans can be seen at http://www.evansradio.com/mikestory.html .
On January 20, 2011, former Hawaii elections clerk Tim Adams signed an affidavit in which he swears that his supervisors in Hawaii told him that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Obama. He swears that he was also told that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi'olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any medical record showing that Obama was born in either facility. Read more: Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=254401#ixzz1C21WDdlc
Americans asking questions below:
“Mr Obama,Were you born at Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa,Kenya? Mother Stanley Ann Dunham and Father Barack Hussein Obama on August 4th 1961 at 7:24 P.M.and weighing 7 lbs and 1 oz.How hard is it for you to tell the truth Mr Obama and is that what you have spent two million dollars to hide from the American people? Also are you a dedicated Moslem? Also do you fully believe in communism as a way of life and want to transform the USA into a communist country with you as dictator? The truth will come out in the end and so it would be best to come clean and clear your consience,if you have one,Thank about it Mr Obama!”
“My questions for Mr. Obama are as follows:
1. Which hospital hosted your birth?
2. Why have you spent nearly $2 million defending yourself from queries about your personal and professional records? Is there something to hide?
3. Why won't you help out your public-sector pals in Hawaii, who claim to be overwhelmed by requests for your long-form birth certificate, by merely authorizing Hawaii to release your long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate?
4. Were you ever a citizen of any country besides the USA and, if so, what is the history and status of your various citizenships?
5. How do you explain the fact that your mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was a student in Washington State just one week after your birth?”
“Mr. Soetoro/Obama, did you in fact give Russia secret information regarding the nuclear capability of Britain, to get Russia to sign your contreversial arms treaty? If you betrayed a NATO ally, as the London Telegraph and other U.K. media outlets report, then you must be removed from office and be charged with treason.
---The Western Journalism website reported this week, no passport record for "Barack Hussein Obama" can be found prior to the time you were an Illinois senator. Would you tell the American people, when was the first time you ever received a U.S. passport? --And then tell us if you were ever issued a passport from another country.
---In your book "Dreams of My Father" you wrote that you were born with "dual citizenship". Would you cite the passage within our Constitution which allows someone with "dual citizenship" to hold the office of president?”
Two people living today are solely responsible for the mortgage meltdown and the theft of $120,000 per American families wealth. Both are free and one still holds an office.
William (Bill) Clinton
Andrew Cuomo
http://www.progressivehistorians.com/2007/11/bill-clintons-role-in-mortgage-crisis.html
DUMP FEMA! and put Walmart in charge of disaster planning. I have no doubt they'd figure out a way to get supplies, ice, and bottled water into disaster areas within 24 hours of an event.
A 2007 Associated Press photograph, suppressed until now, shows the school register of the child who is today known as Barack Hussein Obama but was officially listed then as Barry Soetoro, whose citizenship was listed as "Indonesian" and whose religion was listed as "Islam." The visual evidence starkly contradicts the Obama campaign's claim that he was not a Muslim and confirms that he is a national of at least one other country.
In addition, it raises the highly problematic issue of what is Obama's official name. If it turns out to Barry Soetoro, and no official change of name was ever made, Obama may face an array of charges of deception and misprision that may throw into doubt, at the very least, his fitness to run.
Deep doubts remain about the veracity of the "certificate of live birth" image produced for his campaign by the radical left-wing Daily Kos blog. There are reports that investigative teams -- from the Republican and Democratic parties as well as various intelligence agencies -- are seeking out the details of his murky childhood from Kenya to Indonesia. There are indications of growing disquiet in the circles of power that the so-called "smears" may have understated the gravity of the candidate's identity problem: he may not be American, he was not raised Christian and, it appears, he was not Barack Hussein Obama.
You can view it for yourself here:
http://israelstreams.com/?israelinsider.html?http://israelinsider.com/Articles1/Politics/13056.htm
Here is a photo difference of a Genuine long form Birth Certificate that everyone I know has, and a Certification Of Live Birth (COLB) that means nothing.
http://www.freedomtruth.us/2010/04/19/two-wheres-the-birth-certificate-petitions-you-should-sign/
Not to worry, I think the lies are coming to the surface faster than anyone thought. It is only a matter of time now before he is called on them. The canaries will sing before the next election....
No need to use foul language. Anyway, saying Joe will become President is utterly false and diminishing the magnitude of this infiltration greatly. You need to keep in mind that this have never happened before in the history of the country. This is what will be involved:
#1 A Constitutional Crisis
#2 The entire Democrat Party held responsible
#3 Americans feeling of rape will permeate their conscious like never before
#4 Everything with obama's signature becomes Null & Void
#5 This would be a historic precedent of titanic proportions and the most severe violation of OUR government ever
More than the Rosenberg's could have ever done...
Former Hawaii elections clerk Tim Adams has now signed an affidavit swearing he was told by his supervisors in Hawaii that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Barack Obama Jr. in Hawaii and that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi'olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any record of Obama having been born in their medical facilities.
Remember an affidavit is a LEGAL statement that holds up in a court of law. Anyone making FALSE claims would be prosecuted.
Moreover, Adams claims, the Hawaii government was engaged in a cover-up designed to tell the American public through the Obama-supporting mainstream media that Obama was born in Hawaii, even though no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Obama could be found on record in the Hawaii Department of Health.
I told you it will come out soon…..Be patient, because America will soon know that obama is a usurper, no two ways about it.
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=254401
Related Offers: (All links below:)
Get the free, in-depth special report on eligibility that could bring an end to Obama's presidency
There's a new strategy to get answers to Obama's eligibility questions. See how you can help.
See the movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential-eligibility mystery!
Join the petition campaign to make President Obama reveal his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate!
Want to turn up the pressure to learn the facts? Get your signs and postcards asking for the president's birth-certificate documentation from the Birth Certificate Store!
Send a contribution to support the national billboard campaign that asks the simple question, "Where's the birth certificate?"
Get your yard signs and rally signs that ask the same question – and make sure it's in time for the next tea-party rally
Get your permanent, detachable magnetic bumper stickers for your car, truck or file cabinet – and join the campaign for constitutional integrity.
Get the most comprehensive special report ever produced on the Obama eligibility issue.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php/?pageId=199373
http://www.wnd.com/validationofbarackobama
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=104814
http://www.wnd.com/obama_petition
http://superstore.wnd.com/store/subdept.asp?SUBDEPARTMENT_ID=251
http://superstore.wnd.com/s.nl/c.811217/id.614/.f
http://superstore.wnd.com/s.nl/c.811217/id.662/.f
http://superstore.wnd.com/s.nl/c.811217/id.511/.f
http://superstore.wnd.com/s.nl/c.811217/id.530/.f
***HAPPY 100TH BIRTHDAY RONALD REAGAN*** Thank you for the 25 years of prosperity you gave us after Mr. Peanut Head (part 1) collapsed the economy, and the safety you bestowed upon all by bringing down the Soviet Union!!!
American Idol verifies birth certificates for contestants....Hmmmm, now why in the world would we take someones word for the Office of the Presidency?
Now that START Treaty was signed, America is wide open for a nuclear strike - But Barack Obama doesn’t care. Barack Obama believes that “the Cold War is over” and that we live in a post-nuclear world. Obama believes that we do not need nuclear weapons and that we don’t really need any kind of missile defense either.
In fact, when it comes to nuclear weapons Barack Obama’s primary motivation seems to be getting rid of as many of them as possible. As noble as that may sound, the truth is that the world is becoming a much more dangerous place and the threats that the U.S. is facing are only increasing.
Unfortunately, Obama does not see things that way. Shortly after he was elected, Barack Obama delivered a major foreign policy speech in Prague during which he called for a world that was free from nuclear weapons.
Apparently he was quite serious about this, and Obama has publicly stated time after time that he is convinced that America must lead the way when it comes to nuclear disarmament.
Stock up for the Holidays with eFoodsDirect and get FREE Shipping!
So exactly what would this START treaty do? Well, the following are 9 reasons why the START treaty must be stopped….
#1 The treaty restricts both the United States and Russia to a maximum of 1,550 deployed strategic nuclear warheads. For the U.S. military this would represent a decline of well over 90% from a peak of approximately 31,255 strategic nuclear warheads in 1967. The treaty would also limit the total number of deployed ballistic missiles or nuclear bombers to 700.
#2 As part of the treaty we would tell Russia exactly where our few remaining nuclear weapons are and allow the Russians to inspect those sites. So if the time ever came for the Russians to strike our emasculated nuclear arsenal, they would know exactly where to find our few remaining nuclear weapons.
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
#3 The treaty is so vague about some of the key issues that the two sides are already arguing about what it means. For example, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov says that the restrictions on missile defense are “clearly spelled out in the treaty” and that these restrictions are “legally binding”. But in a recent letter to U.S. Senators, Barack Obama stated that the treaty “places no limitations on the development or deployment of our missile-defense programs.”
#4 Nuclear weapons technology is rapidly spreading around the globe and the need for a missile defense system is greater than ever. If this treaty does restrict our ability to build a missile defense system (as the wording of the treaty clearly seems to indicate), that is a very serious threat to our national security. What is going to happen one day when a rogue nation or a rogue terror group launches a nuke at us? Excuses will not cut it at that point.
#5 The treaty completely ignores the very serious imbalance that exists between the U.S. and Russia when is comes to tactical nuclear weapons. Today it is estimated that the Russians have approximately 10,000 tactical nuclear warheads while the U.S. only has a few hundred. These tactical nuclear warheads can be delivered by cruise missiles, long-range artillery or aircraft. The treaty does nothing to change those numbers. This would put the United States at a very serious strategic disadvantage.
#6 The treaty does nothing to restrict the quality of long-range missiles. Currently, Russia is busy modernizing their strategic long-range missiles. The United States is not doing the same. Once again, this could leave the United States at a very serious strategic disadvantage.
#7 The Russian government has shown that they are not trustworthy. Of course, the same thing could be said about the Obama administration. Anyone who trusts anything that Barack Obama says at this point is an idiot.
#8 North Korea already has nukes, Iran is developing nuclear technology and a number of other important nations such as Venezuela are rumored to be interested in nukes. This is simply not a good time to be getting weaker.
#9 If World War III were to break out over the next decade, the United States would very likely find itself facing a Chinese/Russian alliance. The combined conventional military forces of China and Russia are far superior to those of the United States. The only major advantage that we had was our edge in strategic weaponry, and this treaty would greatly weaken that advantage.
Unfortunately, most of those that will read this article simply are not going to care. The vast majority of Americans believe that the Cold War is over and that war with either China or Russia is next to impossible.
But if this treaty is passed, and there is every indication that it will be, then it is going to make a nuclear first strike against the United States much, much more likely.
Previously, everyone knew that if they messed with America they could potentially face being nuked into oblivion. But if this treaty is passed, our nuclear arsenal would be slashed to the bone and our potential enemies would know precisely where to strike to take out most of our remaining nukes.
Snopes also does not state facts that are blatantly true sometimes, and uses the "more research is underway" excuse. Like when it was discovered that the United States did envoke DEPORTATION of illegal Mexican aliens under "Operation Wetback".... I caught Snopes red-handed on that one...
We need another flushing of illegals again, it has been long enough!
Planned Parenthood caught in sting operation coaching and covering up illegal child sex abuse at Perth Amboy NJ location….. And you thought this group was just an innocent community service… Wonder when it will be prosecuted and shut down?
Why are liberals against tort reform? Because of this, see below:
It's time again for the annual 'Stella Awards'! For those unfamiliar with these awards, they are named after 81-year-old Stella Liebeck who spilled hot coffee on herself and successfully sued the McDonald's in New Mexico , where she purchased coffee. You remember, she took the lid off the coffee and put it between her knees while she was driving. Who would ever think one could get burned doing that, right? That's right; these are awards for the most outlandish lawsuits and verdicts in the U.S. You know, the kinds of cases that make you scratch your head. So keep your head scratcher handy.
Here are the Stellas for this past year -- 2010 :
*SEVENTH PLACE*
Kathleen Robertson of Austin, Texas was awarded $80,000 by a jury of her peers after breaking her ankle tripping over a toddler who was running inside a furniture store. The store owners were understandably surprised by the verdict, considering the running toddler was her own son
Start scratching!
* SIXTH PLACE *
Carl Truman, 19, of Los Angeles , California won $74,000 plus medical expenses when his neighbor ran over his hand with a Honda Accord. Truman apparently didn't notice there was someone at the wheel of the car when he was trying to steal his neighbor's hubcaps.
Scratch some more...
* FIFTH PLACE *
Terrence Dickson, of Bristol , Pennsylvania , who was leaving a house he had just burglarized by way of the garage. Unfortunately for Dickson, the automatic garage door opener malfunctioned and he could not get the garage door to open. Worse, he couldn't re-enter the house because the door connecting the garage to the house locked when Dickson pulled it shut. Forced to sit for eight, count 'em, EIGHT days and survive on a case of Pepsi and a large bag of dry dog food, he sued the homeowner's insurance company claiming undue mental anguish. Amazingly, the jury said the insurance company must pay Dickson $500,000 for his anguish. We should all have this kind of anguish Keep scratching. There are more...
Double hand scratching after this one..
*FOURTH PLACE*
Jerry Williams, of Little Rock, Arkansas, garnered 4th Place in the Stella's when he was awarded $14,500 plus medical expenses after being bitten on the butt by his next door neighbor's beagle - even though the beagle was on a chain in its owner's fenced yard. Williams did not get as much as he asked for because the jury believed the beagle might have been provoked at the time of the butt bite because Williams had climbed over the fence into the yard and repeatedly shot the dog with a pellet gun.
Pick a new spot to scratch, you're getting a bald spot..
* THIRD PLACE *
Amber Carson of Lancaster, Pennsylvania because a jury ordered a Philadelphia restaurant to pay her $113,500 after she slipped on a spilled soft drink and broke her tailbone. The reason the soft drink was on the floor: Ms. Carson had thrown it at her boyfriend 30 seconds earlier during an argument. What ever happened to people being responsible for their own actions?
Only two more so ease up on the scratching...
*SECOND PLACE*
Kara Walton, of Claymont , Delaware sued the owner of a night club in a nearby city because she fell from the bathroom window to the floor, knocking out her two front teeth. Even though Ms. Walton was trying to sneak through the ladies room window to avoid paying the $3.50 cover charge, the jury said the night club had to pay her $12,000....oh, yeah, plus dental expenses. Go figure.
Ok. Here we go!!
* FIRST PLACE *
This year's runaway First Place Stella Award winner was: Mrs. Merv Grazinski, of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, who purchased new 32-foot Winnebago motor home. On her first trip home, from an OU football game, having driven on to the freeway, she set the cruise control at 70 mph and calmly left the driver's seat to go to the back of the Winnebago to make herself a sandwich. Not surprisingly, the motor home left the freeway, crashed and overturned. Also not surprisingly, Mrs. Grazinski sued Winnebago for not putting in the owner's manual that she couldn't actually leave the driver's seat while the cruise control was set. The Oklahoma jury awarded her, are you sitting down?
$1,750,000 PLUS a new motor home. Winnebago actually changed their manuals as a result of this suit, just in case Mrs. Grazinski has any relatives who might also buy a motor home.
If you think the court system is out of control, be sure to pass this one on. (no wonder lawyers are so respected too.)
This is why our healthcare, all types of insurance, and everything we buy costs so much! Because of lawyers and frivolous lawsuits. And guess what? The democrats blocked tort reform, Congress and the White House are full of lawyers in the democrat party. We need people who run a payroll instead! Yup, you voted them in ’06 & ‘08! Happy?
I'll ask you and all the other demented minded cacklers both male, female and those who still can’t figure it out to stop replying to my old posts, including the god of tornado alley.
You people continue to play in your alternate video game worlds of psychosis and dementia. Most of you if not all have been sexually abused as children and feel worthless I'm certain.
That is too bad, but to take it out on others in society is vicious and unconscionable. I see why you love obama, nancy and reed so much.
They reflect the insecurity of yourselves, but yet have the power to control the slaves you wish you had.
Bask in the glory for now, for one day it will all collapse. The imbedded Human desire to be free and happy is stronger than the biggest government. And don't forget, when your times are up...It will be too late to correct your past life. I am not your final Judge…
RBL
The Angry White Liberal. When things aren't going their way, the Angry White Liberal wails and gnashes their teeth, rends their garments, and hurls invective at the opposition. Their rhetoric and prose is so heated, it's gotten to the point where you need to put on oven mitts before opening the paper. They are so convinced of the righteousness of their positions that they lash out uncontrollably at anybody who disagrees with them. For the Angry White Liberal, dissent is anathema. Antagonism is illegitimate. Only conformity to prevailing liberal opinion is enough to still their rage.
“Conservatives tend to be happier than liberals in general,” said Dr. Martin, a psychologist at the University of Western Ontario. “A conservative outlook rationalizes social inequality, accepting the world as it is, and making it less of a threat to one’s well-being, whereas a liberal outlook leads to dissatisfaction with the world as it is, and a sense that things need to change before one can be really happy.”
Gold and silver dropping significantly....
Retail sales up since election......Consumer confidence up as well.
Let's check what party cares more about the poor?
Conservatives (mostly Republicans)
-Donate MORE of their income to the needy than liberals
-Volunteer their time to help the poor much more than liberals
-Prefer to teach the poor how to provide for themselves in the long run, unlike liberals.
-Prefer the Church and Synagogues for feeding the needy using voluntary time of others rather than the inefficient and corrupt government who take paychecks in order to help.
-Prefer an Independent population who can provide for themselves and family to make the country strong.
Liberals (mostly Democrats)
-Are stingy with their money, and keep it to themselves
-Believe in confiscation of wealth from the middle class
-Prefer to keep the poor and needy down like the Blacks so that they continue to have a voting block they can exploit
-Prefer a dependent society and weak nation so as to have complete power and control over the populace
-Prefer to destroy faith in GOD especially Christianity and Judaism, so the people will turn to the government as their GOD
Any questions?
Bravo F6!... I try not to post during market hours, but I have to say that I may have misjudged you.....You do see the fabrications by lefties like the post you responded too.
I'd bet dollars to donuts that these letters originated from the left to smear the right. Would not be the first time. CBS Alaska for example comes to mind, caught red handed on tape from open cellphone.
Everyone knows -who has a functioning brain that is, that the massive gatherings of center right rally's have proven that they are the most civil, caring, and considerate humans in America. Far far different than the other side for example with the LA Riots of '92.
What is not true? Please explain.......
Show me in writing how obama's birth certificate for Hawaii was debunked years ago...When the real one was never shown. Even a marxist socialist like Abercrombie could not find it.
I got news for you. It is not only middle aged men over 50. I see you are a sexist. LOL
It is blue collar America and all who earn a Private Sector paycheck, for without them the government paychecks would not exist.
The TEA PARTY has only started, and the commies (includes all socialists. fascists and the like) in Washington and America will be flushed out in the next few years just like it was in the past.
A Constitutional Republic will be restored.
Oh, and you still dodge the facts I gave...
Why the name labeling and not facts to disprove what I state? I have yet to see a liberal prove me wrong with facts instead of dodging and changing subjects.
Are you scared of the truth also? If so, you better realize that eventually the truth always works its way to the surface. Better to accept it now than prolong the lies.
Many a marriages would have been saved this way.....
Obama’s three names - now: How can someone have three different names? Well, a private investigator states “the only times people have more than one name (an alias) is when involved in criminal behavior or they have something to hide”
Barrack Hussein obama
Barry Soerto
Barry Soebarkah
Actually not at all, since it was not a lobotomy, but a knowledge infusion by studying OUTSIDE the public school system. I used to be an ignorant person such as yourself.
Do you find reality in having your umbilical cord attached to this IHUB forum?
-Joseph Farah is offering a $10,000 reward to anyone who can prove he or she was present at the birth of Barack Obama
-Jason Hommel, who runs a silver business has announced he’s offering a reward of $100,000 for proof that Barack Obama is a "natural born" citizen of the United States and, therefore, eligible to be president.
-Gregg Jackson is offering to pay $50,000 to anybody in the media who can answer his simple, three-part question about Obama.
Here is his three-part question:
1. What hospital in Hawaii was Barack Hussein Obama born in?
2. Who was the attending physician who delivered BHO?
3. What time was BHO born?
Any 12 year-old signing up for Little League would have to provide this information on their birth certificate. Yet not one person in the entire media has been able to provide the answers to very simple questions I have posed above.
$50,000 cold hard cash to anybody in the media who can show me the actual authenticated long-form birth certificate which answers the above questions.
-The owners of "Reward for Obama's Birth Certificate" website are offering to pay $25,000,000 (yes 25 million) to Barack Hussein Obama if he will produce his "real" long-form birth certificate.
Obama has spent $1.5 Million dollars to block it’s release. Ask yourself WTF is wrong with him? Or better yet, what is he hiding?
Here are the current rewards being offered to the doctor/s, nurse/s who witnessed obama’s birth or even obama himself for his official long form birth certificate: So far no takers…BUT
Obama has spent $1.5 Million dollars to block it’s release. Ask yourself WTF is wrong with him? Or better yet, what is he hiding?
-Joseph Farah is offering a $10,000 reward to anyone who can prove he or she was present at the birth of Barack Obama
-Jason Hommel, who runs a silver business has announced he’s offering a reward of $100,000 for proof that Barack Obama is a "natural born" citizen of the United States and, therefore, eligible to be president.
-Gregg Jackson is offering to pay $50,000 to anybody in the media who can answer his simple, three-part question about Obama.
Here is his three-part question:
1. What hospital in Hawaii was Barack Hussein Obama born in?
2. Who was the attending physician who delivered BHO?
3. What time was BHO born?
Any 12 year-old signing up for Little League would have to provide this information on their birth certificate. Yet not one person in the entire media has been able to provide the answers to very simple questions I have posed above.
$50,000 cold hard cash to anybody in the media who can show me the actual authenticated long-form birth certificate which answers the above questions.
-The owners of "Reward for Obama's Birth Certificate" website are offering to pay $25,000,000 (yes 25 million) to Barack Hussein Obama if he will produce his "real" long-form birth certificate.
Government spending is funded solely by the Private Sector worker through confiscation of taxes. Rob Peter to pay Paul. Simple as that.
No I don't speak Ivy League gibberish like Billy Boy. You are correct.
"The most charming are always the most deceitful and biggest liars"
Hidden History, what liberals IE the public schools will not teach and democrats hide:
-FACT – The KKK was started by Democrats in 1866
-FACT – The first seven (7) Black Congress members elected post Civil War were ALL Republicans
-FACT – Democrats boycotted Black members of Congress and even changed election laws AGAINST Blacks in voting, once they again became the majority in power
-FACT – In the 1920’s the KKK was a wing of the Democrat Party (ex. Robert Byrd)
-FACT – There were a total of 4,800 lynchings by Democrats. 3,500 were Blacks AND 1,300 were WHITE REPUBLICANS. (Democrats were against Republicans and Blacks)
-FACT - The N.R.A. was instrumental in arming Blacks against the KKK
**And the strange thing is that Democrats still control Blacks today - wrapped around their fingers. Go figure
The Hughes Amendment cover-up by democrats - (banned a civilian from ownership or transfer rights of any fully automatic weapon which was not registered as of May 19, 1986)
There is a document that claims to be researched by one Alfonso I. Garza, and appears to be a House Congressional Record from April 10th, 1986, the day the Bill was passed in the House of Representatives. It clearly shows that Amendment 777 was voted on by a voice vote, and declared to have passed by Rep. Rangel, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole. Rep. Sensenbrenner demanded a recorded vote, and Record Vote 73 was taken. It failed, with a tally of aye: 124 no: 298 nv: 12. There are claims that the vote was later overturned by Record Vote 74, but this is ridiculous. First, Record Vote 74 is listed in the Library of Congress Records as being taken on Amendment 770, which was brought by Rep. Volkmer. Second, Record Vote 74 shows that Rep. Hughes voted No. If this vote was really on the machine gun ban that he proposed, why would he vote against it?
The Library of Congress Record (found here: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d099:HR04332:@@@L&summ2=m&), shows that there was no recorded vote on Amendment 777, and in fact, there is no trace anywhere of Record Vote 73 on the page. The above Congressional Record (unproven- your own research will have to find the true Government copy to verify) clearly mentions a recorded vote on the Amendment, which did not pass (Record Vote 73), but the Library of Congress record makes no mention at all of a recorded vote. It simply says that the Amendment passed by a Voice Vote, which is what Rep. Rangel claimed.
"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country." --Adolf Hitler
Daily Kos and Salon - two left-wing propaganda machines along with politico like the ones funded by the king of lies George Soros....
Another little fact:
25% of adults have been sexually abused as children. They turn into liberals and take it out on the rest of society. Some also get fat, some take drugs, some become abusers as well. Truth hurts....
Is that right? Well think about this - What if I'm right and you're wrong?
Can't wait to hear about Chris Matthew's legs after America finds out obama is officially a usurper!!! woo hoo
Never....Most are atheists and think heaven and hell exist only in peoples imaginations. So they should ask themselves "what if I'm wrong?, do I wan't to risk an eternity in hell and torment by continuing my evil behaviors towards others"?
Thumbs Up!