Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I am trying to be kind with what I have to say as to not get this deleted but your post is one of the more ridiculous you have ever made.
How many of us shareholders knew everything there was to know about mining when we first invested in SRSR eight or nine years ago? Not many. We had to learn (some things the hard way) as we went along. On the surface it appeared ok to take a chance on. As a matter of fact with the history of the previous reports of the property and the Keevil pedigree it looked promising. No one could really understand what a crook Scott was or that it was really Currah pulling the strings.
Probably the most ridiculous statement was "Anyone that knew the slightest amount about mining would have protected themselves from a CTO." If you want us to believe that you, in your infinite wisdom, knew that a CTO was coming, you are sadly mistaken.
How would you know he knows nothing about mining?
First it was Dan has never even been to the site. Now even if Dan goes there it would be bad. You sound like a Democrat.
Fact is Dan has been to the site.
I would think that would also apply to you. And on more than one occasion mr currah!
That's my opinion.
Tick tock, tick tock mr Currah. Day by day, minute by minute, second by second closer to jail.
That's my opinion.
And how are you privy to that information Drew?
Why don't you post copies of those unpaid bills so all can see? We could then get behind you and demand that they be paid.
You would like us to forget Currah and forget Keevil but those are the people that got us here not Dan Byrnes. Currah will be forgotten when he is behind bars and Keevil will be forgotten when Dan, Otto and the rest have brought NioStar to a mine. That's my opinion.
That is your opinion.
Mine is that he saw an opportunity to make a lot of money based on Scott Keevil's phony information and make a lot of money for his investors as well.
Are you forgetting that Drew Currah has already been convicted of security fraud? How many times can a person escape prison? He will go to jail and he knows it. He may very well have brought his family right along with him. What a guy!!!
That's my opinion.
The difference is Dan did not go to jail, the Currah's will.
Oh yeah ... that's my opinion.
With each passing day, every hour, every minute, with each and every tick of the clock the Currah's get closer and closer to their day of reckoning.
They are getting closer and closer to jail time.
That's my opinion.
If it is twisted it is no longer fact. LOL!
Of course that is not what you said is it? Your quote is "most charges are bogus"
bo·gus
['bog?s]
ADJECTIVE
not genuine or true; fake:
"a bogus insurance claim"
synonyms: fake · spurious · false · fraudulent · sham · deceptive · counterfeit · forged · feigned · make-believe · dummy · pseudo · phony · pretend · fictitious.
Now you say the lawyers interpretate the "facts". If lawyers base their charges on facts, they are not bogus charges.
There are no words for that statement!
In the words of the infamous Moojer LOL! "You can.t make this up! Scott is not a scammer, he never was a scammer ..."
SRSR, Joshua Gold, his cannabis company.
LOL! No really! You can't make this stuff up!! LOL!
That's my opinion.
I don't know what reality you exist in, but a respected law firm such as the one representing the company deal in facts. And that's a fact!
Thank you for replying to my deleted message. Funny how you are allowed to plant the seed of wrong doing without any repercussions.
The fact remains that you have no proof that this is happening but wish to let those reading believe that it is happening.
This should be posted over and over again along with the Currah Scams.
I can justify giving away one third of the company for $250,000.
If that $250,000 get us on the road to building a mine that is fine with me. Along with the 250k is his agreement to try to work together to raise $25,000,000 to help complete the process.
I personally don't care about how much Potts gets for his 35% as long as we succeed in building a mine. What if it is a big failure as you have hinted? Potts get 35% of nothing.
You can make all the scenarios you want, but if 250k starts us on the road to where we need to go, give him his 35%
Looks like it will not only be Canada that will be after the Currah's and Keevil et al!
From the article.
"The Company also plans to provide evidence to various government agencies in both Canada and the United States in regards to details relating to these suits."
Maybe the Currah's could be extradited to the U.S. after serving their prison terms in Canada.
Correct, that is your opinion, however flawed. You actually proved jf's point.
In your example concerning the surgeon, who hired the surgeon? Obviously, someone running the hospital. The surgeon didn't just walk in off the street. The person that did the hiring didn't have to know how to perform the operation, just had to qualify the surgeon.
Firemen don't just walk in off the street and become firemen. Someone had to hire the person and see that they are qualified to be or become a fireman.
Does the CEO of the airline have to know how to fly a plane or does he just have to hire qualified people?
So thank you for pointing out that Dan doesn't have to have "mineral knowledge". What he has to do, and is doing, is hiring the right people to bring this mine to fruition. He is qualifying the proper people and putting together a great team just as an official of a company should do.
It will be hard to drill from prison, but that's my personal opinion.
That's not the point and you know it. You seem to pride yourself as being 100% correct. You don't hesitate to call someone out for the slightest misplaced word. Well, this is your statement.
"It's well known to the world of finance that pinks are not valid investments"
The fact of the matter is, some pinks, and not just the one's I cited ARE valid investments.
Finally, before you can't control yourself in correcting me, I am well aware of the danger in dealing with pink sheet companies. I have played the pinks for years. Some success and some failures, but this company, in my opinion, has the possibility of becoming a very valuable investment. Keevil/Currah were just in it for the scam. Dan/Otto are in it for their personal investment.
As people get more desperate to put the company in a bad light they may be prone to say anything in hopes that the truth will not be brought to light. I am anxious to see what the detractors will have to say as the company progresses. I think it will become quite comical.
"It's well known to the world of finance that pinks are not valid investments"
You need to explain this to the world of finance, especially those who have invested in Roche Holdings Ltd, Volkswagen AG, Suez SA, BASF SE, Baer Ag to name a few. They are pink sheet stocks.
And there you have it folks. No matter what Dan has accomplished there is always something to complain about. Ignore all the positive points in Dan's message and focus on one thing that may or may not be in error.
I'll bet some people even agree that Melania Trump should not have worn high heel to the plane going to Texas.
You need to discuss this with es1. He claims no CEO is obligated to increase shareholder value.
Of course no one understands anything as well as you do. We don't even have to ask you, you will tell us.
I believe Penny will have to justify her consulting fee based on her expertise. Was she qualified to give her opinion on the running of SRSR or was she just paid to tell Scott what toilet paper to use in the bathrooms?
Your words "No CEO is obligated to make a profit legally." So was Dan obligated to make a profit for his investors? If that is the case why are you ripping Dan? He shouldn't have had to increase shareholder value. He only had to show an attempt. Obviously the court didn't see it that way (your way).
You really need to get this message to Dan and Otto's attorneys. They must not know what they are doing and you could put them on the right track. If as you say Scott is not guilty of anything, they are wasting their time.
Dan can not provide an accurate statement. His financials would only be a continuation from the previous financial statement. That would include the theft of shares by Keevil and Currah and the phony charges for supposed work being done by the Currah gang.
To issue a financial statement at this point would be as flawed as the previous ones.
Wrong again. Dan will only have to have Scott/Currah show proof that the statements provided by Scott are genuine. Judge "Show us what was done to merit the shares and show us what you did to earn the deferred payments."
Scott will have to prove his phony statements.
All Dan has to do is say an accurate statement can only be provided once we clear up the phony shares issued and the phony charges for deferred payments.
Not true at all. Currah and Keevil must prove what has been included in the old financials. They need to prove what they spent the money on. Who it went to and why. They need to show what the millions of shares of stock they printed and distribute were for. They need to show what qualifications the Currahs had that justified the payments.
They have a lot to answer for, like Currahs previous legal problems, and judging from the venting going on this board they are plenty scared. They have every reason to be.
And those of us who "don't know much about civil court" also know that the civil court case had not begun for OJ, and then halted to await the criminal trial.
Key words to your posts are "likely" in the first instance, and "may be" in the latter. Your post even says "the District Court is "empowered". It does not say that it has to be stayed. Could go either way depending on circumstance.
"the two Lithium participants left the meeting precipitously the meeting as Otto was acting 'hysterical' , making no sense whatsoever."
Another sentence from our resident "lawyer".
"Is only the friends of Otto and dan's opinions that matter but everyone else's opinion is of no consequence?"
I read this line and found it hard to believe that you are a lawyer.
Mugrug, the Currahs are just venting. They know they are in deep and they will not get the chance to attack SRSR when they are in jail. With their history of scamming I am sure they will not let him or her anywhere near a computer.
You are a lawyer? Where do you practice?
"Who is Scott/Currahs lawyer again?"
He works for the law firm of Dewey, Cheatem and Howe!
I see someone has already taken the time to explain it to you.
So you read the filings and still posted that Dan and Otto are the only board members even though you knew that Potts is now on the board. And that 3 new board members would be added.
Now you are claiming that pr's are bs even though you had previously claimed no transparency because Dan had not put out pr's.
Are you sweating? Or just a little nervous?
That was a long and detailed pr. One pr, not a series of them to pump up the share price. It detailed what has been done, what is being done and what will be done.
You need to reread it.