Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
But who holds them. PUBLIC FLOAT is around 775M...
Recall: they said they would be self-sufficient by the end of 2019. In good conscience I can’t even call this “moving the goalposts”—because that presumes that there ARE goalposts toward which they’re aiming.
Yep. They had their chance for Medi Part Deux—roughly 3 years ago. Everything they have done to increase shareholder value through increased PPS during that period has been an abject failure and flop.
Ha. If they did anything worth even burping over, the demand in the market would steamroll anything and anyone in the way as it shot up. If and when that ever happens, everyone will know it. In the meantime, as things are (and have been now for 3 years), buyer beware.
Nah—I’m here until this either explodes upward or gets obliterated down to the last crumb of brick and mortar. I’m one of those who derived ENERGY—not exhaustion—from this type of engagement. If and when there’s a tax loss to be taken, I’ll take it at the proverbial end. In the meantime, I will continue to beat the drum and warn others of what they are about to step into: NEVER FORGET.
2 years of a free-fall (.07 to .0002), followed by a 1:150 R/S, followed by ZERO actions to increase shareholder value through higher PPS with the result that we again have fallen 90+% AFTER the R/S—all this does not constitute “smoke and mirrors” or “fearmongering”: these are documentable historical facts true down to this very day...
I wanted to believe EVERYTHING from Day 1–but as I reflect in my experience, I observe that I placed too much credence in “hope” and not enough in hard results. What exactly has changed to merit a reconsideration?
That was precisely my thinking—along with the statements made on social media by principals—3 years ago when I plunked down a lot of cash. I and many others got scorched.
Based on PERFORMANCE (not inference deriving from potential, optimistic thinking, etc)—based solely on explicit performance, the burden to justify “buying more shares” rests clearly with those who are inclined to do so.
Tell that to the folks who went to .07, crashed down to .0002, suffered a 1:150 R/S, and have now lost 90+% in addition to that.
This—ALL of this.
504.2M OS as of 11/2/2020–up from <20M following the R/S earlier this year.
.0017?! That’s .00001133 pre-R/S. Is this going BACK to the trips?! WTF
“Ladies and gents—we have a winner!”
Tell that to those who invested long-term in the belief that this was an INVESTMENT and not a “typical penny”—who now are down DOUBLE 90%: down from .07 high 90%+ PRE-R/S, then ANOTHER 90%+ AFTER the R/S. At some point, empirical RESULTS matter...
All the best to you, Lone!
New recent-recollection low today: .0018 ( / 150= .000012).
That was over two years ago. Haven’t given these keystone cops another red cent—and won’t. Fool me once...
I would agree with that strategy. Roughly 2 years ago I posited on here a strategy that would see them sell CaverStem and then use the proceeds to bankroll the company to the next decision point with the next IP up for bids. However, during that period, they did virtually nothing to increase visibility/commercial potency of CaverStem—and most of that was LONG before (1) COVID-19 and (2) the apparent disappearance of Dr. Gershman from the scene. Lastly, the OS grew (again) month/month by roughly 33% to 430M as of 10/1/2020.
Well nothing else has worked—so I feel a moral obligation to prevent others from having their wallets sucked dry. Either it will drive it up, or out—either way I’m good at this point.
But they (1) don’t charge doctors royalties and (2) net something like $1,600 per kit. This renders them, at least with respect to CaverStem, essentially a medical equipment merchant (the syringe—which they themselves BUY). Are you telling me you believe this to be anything close to an optimal capitalization on this supposedly valuable IP?
These mean nothing unless and until they are embedded within an end-to-end business plan and commercialized to generate substantial revenues beyond operating expenses—or sold to other firms for cash/securities. They’ve had 3 years now (since they first began discussing the commercialization of CaverStem) to do something along either of those lines with any degree of transparency and consistency—and their efforts in these areas of business development, as measured by objective standards of performance, have been an abject disaster.
What PRECISELY do contend is different on any meaningful counts from what occurred at any point of your choosing over the last 2+ years with respect to the same factors?
This has, generally speaking, been true for the last 2+ years—so...
+100
And .0023=.00001533 pre-R/S
PS we are down and ADDITIONAL 90+% SINCE the R/S.
WOW.
I encourage you to look at the history of “results” here—and to bear in mind, in particular, that there was a 1:150 R/S at the beginning of the year. They have been saying “any minute now” for a good 2 years...
Love and blessings to you too, rrao11. Most of us have lost so much that we just watch and wait, ya know? I’m shocked at the prospect that ANYONE associated with this “business” has any professional future whatsoever...
“How LOW can you go”?: .0021= .000014 pre-R/S. WOW.
They’ve been playing the “we got this” card for over 2 years—the results of their efforts notwithstanding...
Apologies for the loss of your friend. I remember him (I think he had the picture of a man in a hat). Peace to all his friends and family
How do you know with certainty that they have not bought all the shares?
How about proof of all that matters: PPS: at .0026–and AFTER a 1:150 R/S—we are near the 52-week low of .002. PS: if you divide .0026 by 150 (to deflate the effect of the R/S on the PPS), you get: .00001733. Scam, gross incompetence, lack of leadership—call it what you will: convertible shareholder value is (and has been for MANY months) ZILCH.
Define “break loose” quantitatively...
Since you want a sports analogy, Don is the goalie and Tim, also on his team, just kicked a goal in his own net. That’s what we’re dealing with here.
Jerry Maguire: “Show me the money!”
Wendy’s: “Where’s the beef?”
21st century politics: “There’s no ‘there’ there.”
All of these can easily characterize CELZ.
Yep—that’s the CELZ I’ve come to know over the last 3 years: PPS CRATERS with “news.” Can make this clown show up.
Prediction: market will yawn—and perhaps laugh out loud.
Group on Fb