Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
From your lips to Gods ears......
I'd MORE than settle for no split at all.
ECG, I'd love to see something like that occur, and maybe (hopefully, possibly?) it is already in the works.
Despite my published skepticism on certain topics, I agree and concur with most here in wanting to see the company, its shareholders, and ESPECIALLY Cancer victims survive and prosper.
Yes, I'm still skeptical in areas but also positive in others. Ronins involvement (with no knowledge of other developments that appear to be happening) is by itself encouraging.
Add the info that we have to date (i.e. Exesomes test, AVID's success and BAVI's forthcoming trials despite PH II and III tribulations ) and it Is hard to ignore.
Stay safe in Maine! It looks like from down here you have some nasty snow headed your way.
EB, I never even began an explanation of why I was or was not there.
I don't understand your statement.
The gist of the topic was whether attending an ASM gives an investor "a greater advantage" than one that did not.
I say no, it does not, but again I thank those that did and also thanks for sharing!
Maybe so, but wouldn't it be awesome if this time it was real and they did?
Yes, I'm skeptical too but this is a big machine that is not easily replicated.
The BOD's will ultimately determine our direction but I am cautionary optimistic by the attention that Ronin and the Exesome progress have brought in the last weeks.
They don't take Shareholder questions.
They say "No No!" when an analyst (or whoever it was) slips in under false intentions. How many questions did they take?
It seemed (AGAIN, IMO) to be fairly orchestrated.
I do hope I'm way off the mark and Monday proves me wrong, but my feet are on the ground.
EB, I don't remember anybody saying that attending the meeting was a waste of money (though I do skip over posts that seem entirely one sided).
Honestly, a multitude of people here, including myself, have commended those that did attend, and even more so, thanked them for bringing it back and sharing it here.
It's kind of about (IMO) that it gives those who did attend a greater advantage in regard to the investment. I do not believe that.
I won't argue the merits of things that were heard there.
PPHM is so much greater than that, or they are not.
Yours, mine, or anyone else's attendance is not going to matter one iota in the path that this company is destined for.
Again, I appreciate your (and others) passion in attending the meetings and staunchly defending the BOD's.
Difference of opinion, and having an open mind to it, is what allows all of us to grow.
Hawk, I commend you and all others for attending the meeting and do acknowledge that.
You spent the time, money and effort to do so.
What I don't believe is that it gives the attendees some "greater knowledge" than those that didn't attend, and I think the last 15 years of SH meetings kind of supports that.
Either they do or they don't. Whether you, me, or anyone else attended will not change the direction.
Those that profess greater knowledge because they were there is what irks me.
IMO, it matters no more than a plug nickel.
Thanks Geo, and yes, i understand and commend (and respect) those that were able to attend (in a perfect world, I would have been there too and keenly interested in what was shared).
I just stumble when I'm told I don't know as much because I wasn't there.
So the fact that I didn't spend a couple grand to go to the meeting makes me "less informed"?
To me (IMO) that is a shaky platform to stand on.
"to pick up on in the early stages"
Bio, I've been here a few years, and to many that makes me an infant.
It's difficult for me to perceive this as "early stages".
I agree with that in many circumstances in business, but I do not agree with you that it is an advantage when it comes to a position as a stockholder.
EB, it is not my responsibility as a shareholder to attend the annual meeting of every company that I hold shares in in order to understand the intent of the company and "what's going on behind the curtain".
That's just not possible! Even if I could afford it and wanted to, it is not possible!
To imply that a person that attends a shareholders meeting "knows and understands more" is contrary to the whole idea of publicly regulated companies. If he won't state it publicly, it is hear say and not something that Lynch or RayJay would put a bet on (I'm pretty sure that they were not there either).
So if I understand correctly, you are saying that King smiled, held hands, and disclosed info at a meeting that he (or PPHM) is not willing (or able) to publish? And I have to spend a couple grand to attend in order to be privy to?
I believe that flies in the face of SEC regulations.
I love the way you think!
I know I get arrows for expressing my skepticism but not much would make me happier than to see $1 to avoid the RS, much less $2-$3 without one!
Wook it up!
North, AGAIN, I don't doubt the Messenger or the words that they heard and are sharing.
I doubt the message.
"you should not make more of it than it is....SK saying they do not want a RS. "
I'm making NOTHING of it.
I doubt his sincerity and truthfulness, and the fact that he will not announce that publicly reinforces that.
In addition, I have not heard him say anything near that except here, second hand, so again (IMO) it is not reliable information.
I don't doubt the posters, I question the message that they were given.
Then please ask him to say it in public.
If he feels comfortable saying it in a private forum, then that should give him MORE motivation to announce it publicly.
PPHMP is not only holding its own, it's up quite nicely today.
That is encouraging in regard to the view of the company as a whole.
I mean no disrespect to the post (or poster) that made the statement that you refer to, however that statement doesn't come anywhere near "quite public".
In a court of law, this is termed "here say" and is quite inadmissible as fact.
An investor not attending an annual meeting should not preclude them from pertinent information in regard to a publicly traded company that they own stock in.
These implications that somehow attending the meeting is financially advantageous are (IMO) ridiculous.
Second hand reports of impactful statements that a company is not willing or able to make publicly are (IMO) insignificant, or even more, viewed suspiciously if the Officer that supposedly said them is not willing to publicly stand behind them.
I'm not trying to hold it down, I'm just asking valid questions about the unaudited financial statements.
I've been reading Financials for 30 years and see questionable items here that I have never seen before.
Generally, if they are audited, the compensated CPA will explain any questions in regard to the statements, many times in the footnotes attached (none).
In light of the lack of a CPA, I posed the questions here, hoping to learn something new. No One could offer an answer to my questions. Because of that inability, I doubt the other info coming from the company in regard to Purchase Orders and Profitability.
This is what investors do.
Geo, I recognize that we differ in many opinions, but I agree with you 100%.
I am baffled as well by the lack of response.
The silence is deafening.
I don't understand why management has been so silent.
PPHM seems like they have the goods but can't figure out what to do with them.
Again, I didn't say it was good or bad, but his statement was correct.
IFU, this is not a "pump and dump" effort (IMO, I've been here before, not with PPHM, but with others).
I do believe, especially given AVID and the possible potential of the exosome test kits (plus hopefully the advancement of Bavi through what now seems to be initial (again) test trials), that there is still opportunity for PPHM to succeed and be profitable to the company and its shareholders.
What I have trouble with is agreeing with all of the opinions that scream it will happen TOMORROW (or yesterday, or in a puzzle piece, a thread or a conference call on Monday).
Ive been to enough rodeos to know that to bet on the long shot is indeed a bet, but a highly speculative one.
Honestly (again, IMO) if you don't change the strategy, the result will not differ. If the BOD's doesn't change, in person or in thought, we are doomed.
I love Statisticians!
Thank you for your Due Diligence in regard to this investment!
Too bad it's so easy to write about later but hard to really accomplish.
That would be me.....
He's right, there are multiple statements of Beneficial Ownership filed yesterday from the link in his post:
http://ir.jcpenney.com/mobile.view?c=70528&p=irol-sec
I'm not saying it's good or bad, but I'm not sure why you were confused by his post and disputing the content.
Either choice would end their paychecks.
It is a commitment that the company made and is obligated to fulfill.
A default on that would truly bring us to pennies.
As much as I keep telling myself I got what I asked for, I could have lived without seeing that!
Looks like we kind of flat-lined on the volume again.
I think that there is more attention to this symbol here on this board than there is in the entire market!
I am only aware of one enthusiastic buyer and one very experienced, enthusiastic seller.
Kabir is going to make us all rich!
He SAYS he is making a profit. I don't need proof!
M ALL IN!
Geo, at this point, I don't think that they could avoid it if they wanted to.
No, MOST of us DO NOT believe it will.
Now it is "Revolutionary"?
Does that go into the book with "imminent" and "fruition"?
Unusual behavior is the status quo here.
If they had any bit of relevant news they would be shouting it from the tree tops!
Yes, I'd love a miracle too, but let's be real.
That type of calculated cunning from this Management is like expecting a poodle to play a minuet.
I don't know, but I sure hope they do it SOON!
IMMINENTLY! if you know what I mean.